Follow TimingCube » Follow TimingCube on Facebook Follow TimingCube on Twitter Follow TimingCube on LinkedIn
Turbo Model




Signal Update
Current Signal Performance as of
Signal Type
Trade Date
Return since issued
World
U.S.
Nasdaq 100
(QQQQ)

Russell 2000
(IWM)
S&P 500
(SPY)

Back to the Top of the page


Market Update
Stocks experienced mixed fortunes during this holiday-shortened week, as small stocks gained while large caps lost ground. The S&P 500 initially moved lower during the first session of the week, but a late rally allowed it to finish the day with only a modest loss while the Nasdaq Composite managed to gain 0.6%. Negative action returned the next day as the markets suffered widespread losses on news that a South Korean island had been attacked by North Korea. With worries over Ireland's debt situation adding to investors' anxiety, all indexes retreated sharply, with the Nasdaq Composite shedding 1.5%. Stocks rebounded strongly Wednesday to recapture all of the previous day's losses as investors took comfort in positive economic news: October personal income and weekly jobless claims data both came in better-than-expected. It should be noted that the rally occurred on light volume, as is often the case the day before Thanksgiving. When trading resumed Friday, investors were faced with renewed concerns over Europe's debt problems now involving Portugal and war threats from North Korea. Stocks retreated as a result, with the S&P 500 posting a 0.75% daily loss.

The Russell 2000 (IWM) and Nasdaq 100 (QQQQ) respectively gained 1.06% and 0.57% over the five-day span while the S&P 500 (SPY) shed 1.24%. All three ETFs remain located above both their 50-day and 200-day exponential moving averages (EMAs).

For its part, our World portfolio posted a 3.40% loss this week. The portfolio consists of the 5 top-ranked world ETFs as of November 5, which marked the beginning of the current 4-week holding period. Please note that since we now have an active Cash signal, the World approach calls for selling your holdings if you follow the "Long Only" or "Long and Short" strategy. Only if you follow the "Buy and Rebalance" strategy should you remain invested in the top 5 ETFs, as the strategy calls for staying invested at all times. Please go to the "Our Service" page for all the details.

Our current Cash signal remains in effect.
Back to the Top of the page


Trend Timing School
A word on leverage investment techniques

Sophisticated investors have always exploited options to create leverage. Because of their complexity and leveraging power options can be deadly for the non-initiated, which is why they earn the highest level of risk of all the alternatives. Yet, in the hands of an expert, they can yield actual risk levels substantially lower than other approaches. We went into more details on this subject in the July 25th, 2008 Weekly Update, as we described an option strategy which can achieve performance comparable with that of equity based strategies with a much smaller portion of capital at risk (say about 10%). This means options let you apply much more leverage than margin does, and by applying them wisely your overall market exposure can be decreased substantially.

For a long time, the only way to simplify all of this and side-step many of the issues, and circumvent the no margin trading in retirement accounts rule, was to instead use the leveraged mutual funds that seek to achieve the same results as margin trading. Fund families such as ProFunds and Rydex have been around for years and have made Long and Short strategies practical for hundreds of thousands of investors. Offsetting the ease of use, the leveraged mutual funds have exhibited performance discrepancies as compared to ETFs (see June 25th, 2010 Weekly Update). A large contributor to their performance deficit is the lag incurred by the mutual funds for having to trade at the close on the trade date instead of at the open like ETFs, known as slippage. The remaining shortfall is mostly attributable to the negative compounding effect inherent in how the funds work (see January 23rd, 2009 Weekly Update).

Since then we have seen the apparition of more and more leveraged ETFs which go further in addressing investor concerns than any of the alternatives. They are by far the simplest to use and trade like stock at any time during the day. Their lower costs and risks make them the hands-down winners for most investors. The only remaining drawback is the negative compounding effect which under certain market conditions will negatively impact performance.
For information, here is a list of the leveraged ETFs available today for the major indexes:

ETF Long / Short
 Reference Index
Leverage
Fund Family
2x
3x
 2x 
 3x 
2x
3x
2x
3x
 2x 
 2x 
3x
3x
Russell Midcap Index
3x


Back to the Top of the page


FAQ of the Week
Question: How do ETFs and mutual funds compare?

We take the opportunity of the TTS article above to elaborate a little more on ETFs and mutual funds. As the two primary investing choices for Trend Timers, we have been comparing the two alternatives for years. Due to the rapid evolution in the ETF industry the competitive landscape has been shifting, clearly in favor of ETFs.

There are many types of ETFs and mutual fund products, and it is hard to lump them all in the same bag for comparison. In order to focus on the type of funds we require to implement our strategies we have narrowed our comparison to ETF families which offer inverse, double and double inverse funds, i.e. ProShares, and matched them up with the bull/bear mutual fund families which offer the same choices (Direxion, ProFunds and Rydex).

The table below provides a quick assesment of how ETFs and mutual funds compare.

 
ETFs
Mutual funds
Simplicity
Simple fund buy/sell
Simple fund buy/sell/exchange
Retirement accounts
All 4 strategies
All 4 strategies
Trade execution
Continuous while market open
At market close
Costs
Low expense ratio (0.95%)
High expense ratio (1.25-2.00%)
Index tracking
Good
But leveraged funds can vary significantly*
Good
But Leveraged funds can
vary significantly
*
Performance
Leveraged funds can
outperform or underperform*
Leveraged funds can
outperform or underperform*
Liquidity
High
Low to Medium
Trading restrictions
None
Brokers enforced frequent trading rules

* To understand the idiosyncrasies of leveraged mutual funds, read January 23rd, 2009 Weekly Update.

Warm wishes and until next week.

The TimingCube Staff
Back to the Top of the page
 

Follow TimingCube » Follow TimingCube on Facebook Follow TimingCube on Twitter Follow TimingCube on LinkedIn

   Turbo Model
   Results
 
   Classic Model
  
   Site Map
   Glossary

TimingCube® is a registered trademark of Fraser Partners, LLC.
Disclaimer/Terms of Use    Privacy Policy
©2001- Fraser Partners, LLC
  All Rights Reserved.