|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Current
Signal Performance as of
Signal
Type |
Trade
Date |
Return
since issued |
|
|
|
World |
U.S. |
|
Nasdaq
100
(QQQQ)
|
Russell
2000
(IWM)
|
S&P
500
(SPY)
|
|

Stocks experienced mixed fortunes during this holiday-shortened week, as small stocks gained while large caps lost ground. The S&P 500 initially moved lower during the first session of the week, but a late rally allowed it to finish the day with only a modest loss while the Nasdaq Composite managed to gain 0.6%. Negative action returned the next day as the markets suffered widespread losses on news that a South Korean island had been attacked by North Korea. With worries over Ireland's debt situation adding to investors' anxiety, all indexes retreated sharply, with the Nasdaq Composite shedding 1.5%. Stocks rebounded strongly Wednesday to recapture all of the previous day's losses as investors took comfort in positive economic news: October personal income and weekly jobless claims data both came in better-than-expected. It should be noted that the rally occurred on light volume, as is often the case the day before Thanksgiving. When trading resumed Friday, investors were faced with renewed concerns over Europe's debt problems now involving Portugal and war threats from North Korea. Stocks retreated as a result, with the S&P 500 posting a 0.75% daily loss.
The Russell 2000 (IWM) and Nasdaq 100 (QQQQ) respectively gained 1.06% and 0.57% over the five-day span while the S&P 500 (SPY) shed 1.24%. All three ETFs remain located above both their 50-day and 200-day exponential moving averages (EMAs).
For its part, our World portfolio posted a 3.40% loss this week. The portfolio consists of the 5 top-ranked world ETFs as of November 5, which marked the beginning of the current 4-week holding period. Please note that since we now have an active Cash signal, the World approach calls for selling your holdings if you follow the "Long Only" or "Long and Short" strategy. Only if you follow the "Buy and Rebalance" strategy should you remain invested in the top 5 ETFs, as the strategy calls for staying invested at all times. Please go to the "Our Service" page for all the details.
Our current Cash signal remains in effect.

A
word on leverage investment techniques
Sophisticated investors have always exploited options to create
leverage. Because of their complexity and leveraging power options
can be deadly for the non-initiated, which is why they earn
the highest level of risk of all the alternatives. Yet, in the
hands of an expert, they can yield actual risk levels substantially
lower than other approaches. We went into more details on this
subject in the
July 25th, 2008 Weekly Update, as we described
an option strategy which can achieve performance comparable
with that of equity based strategies with a much smaller portion
of capital at risk (say about 10%). This means options let you
apply much more leverage than margin does, and by applying them
wisely your overall market exposure can be decreased substantially.
For a long time, the only way to simplify all of this and side-step
many of the issues, and circumvent the no margin trading in
retirement accounts rule, was to instead use the leveraged mutual
funds that seek to achieve the same results as margin trading.
Fund families such as ProFunds and Rydex have been around for
years and have made Long and Short strategies practical for
hundreds of thousands of investors. Offsetting the ease of use,
the leveraged mutual funds have exhibited performance discrepancies
as compared to ETFs (see
June 25th, 2010 Weekly Update).
A large contributor to their performance deficit is the lag
incurred by the mutual funds for having to trade at the close
on the trade date instead of at the open like ETFs, known as
slippage. The remaining shortfall is mostly attributable to
the negative compounding effect inherent in how the funds work
(see
January 23rd, 2009 Weekly Update).
Since then we have seen the apparition of more and more leveraged
ETFs which go further in addressing investor concerns than any
of the alternatives. They are by far the simplest to use and
trade like stock at any time during the day. Their lower costs
and risks make them the hands-down winners for most investors.
The only remaining drawback is the negative compounding effect
which under certain market conditions will negatively impact
performance.
For information, here is a list of the leveraged ETFs available
today for the major indexes:
ETF
Long / Short |
Reference
Index |
Leverage |
Fund
Family |
|
|
|
2x |
|
|
|
3x |
|
|
|
2x |
|
|
|
3x |
|
|
|
2x |
|
|
|
3x |
|
|
|
2x |
|
|
|
3x |
|
|
|
2x |
|
|
|
2x |
|
|
|
3x |
|
|
|
3x |
|
|
Russell
Midcap Index
|
3x |
|
Question:
How do ETFs and mutual funds compare?
We take the opportunity of the TTS article above to elaborate
a little more on ETFs and mutual funds. As the two primary investing
choices for Trend Timers, we have been comparing the two alternatives
for years. Due to the rapid evolution in the ETF industry the
competitive landscape has been shifting, clearly in favor of
ETFs.
There
are many types of ETFs and mutual fund products, and it is hard
to lump them all in the same bag for comparison. In order to
focus on the type of funds we require to implement our strategies
we have narrowed our comparison to ETF families which offer
inverse, double and double inverse funds, i.e. ProShares, and
matched them up with the bull/bear mutual fund families which
offer the same choices (Direxion, ProFunds and Rydex).
The table below provides a quick assesment of how ETFs and mutual
funds compare.
| |
ETFs
|
Mutual
funds
|
| Simplicity |
Simple
fund buy/sell
|
Simple
fund buy/sell/exchange
|
| Retirement
accounts |
All
4 strategies
|
All
4 strategies
|
| Trade
execution |
Continuous
while market open
|
At
market close
|
| Costs |
Low
expense ratio (0.95%)
|
High
expense ratio (1.25-2.00%)
|
| Index
tracking |
Good
But leveraged funds can vary significantly*
|
Good
But Leveraged funds can
vary significantly*
|
| Performance |
Leveraged
funds can
outperform or underperform*
|
Leveraged
funds can
outperform or underperform*
|
| Liquidity |
High
|
Low
to Medium
|
| Trading
restrictions |
None
|
Brokers
enforced frequent trading rules
|
*
To understand the idiosyncrasies of leveraged mutual funds,
read January 23rd, 2009 Weekly Update.
Warm wishes and until next week.
The TimingCube
Staff
 |
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbo Model
|
|
|
|
Classic Model
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|