Follow TimingCube » Follow TimingCube on Facebook Follow TimingCube on Twitter Follow TimingCube on LinkedIn
Turbo Model




What's new this week?

We listed a new article that recently appeared in Better Investing Magazine in our "In the News" page.


Signal Update
Current Signal Performance as of
Signal Type
Trade Date
Index
Return since issued
Nasdaq 100
Russell 2000
S&P 500
QQQ

Cumulative Returns since First TimingCube Live Signal () as of
Index
Long Only
Long Only
with
Margin
Long & Short
Long & Short
with
Margin
Buy & Hold
Nasdaq 100
Russell 2000
S&P 500
QQQ

Note: QQQ returns are included for continuity sake.

Back to the Top of the page


Market Update
Not surprisingly, the week was characterized by low trading activity as U.S. investors took time off to enjoy the Thanksgiving holiday. Despite the lack of major corporate and economic news, markets proceeded to move higher, keeping the current rally alive and well. The Russell 2000 finished at a new all-time high on Friday while the Nasdaq 100 reached its highest weekly close of the year. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 respectively gained 1.05% and 1.68% on the week. The Russell 2000 continued to outperform, with a gain of 2.89%.

The week's quiet market action did not induce any changes for our Model and our Buy signal consequently remains in effect.

Back to the Top of the page


Trend Timing School
Quantifying the market's ups and downs

The Trend Timing system originated in the study of stock markets, and many statistical facts help us better understand their long-term behavior as well as the importance of relying on the current trend as an investing guide. To the casual observer, daily market gyrations appear to be totally random, but a careful examination of what actually happens unveils a strikingly different picture. Somewhere in the madness there clearly seems to be some organization, and some repeatable yet changeable cyclical patterns emerge.

As can be seen in the table below, while the number of up and down days has almost been even during the last five years (51% versus 49%), the longer 15-year view exhibits a stronger bias towards up days (55%) versus down days (45%). This is one of the statistics which Buy and Hold advocates utilize as a foundation for their investing conviction: "Since over the long run markets go up more frequently than down, simply Buy and Hold for guaranteed profits". Ironically, this also happens to be the very statistic that compels us to attempt to avoid the down stages. The most obvious market hint for Trend Timers is the fact that somehow these random-looking daily ups and downs have a way to group into periods that see pronounced upward movements known as bull markets and declines known as bear markets.

5 years
15 years
  Percentage of time spent in Bull/Bear markets
Bull  
43%
71%
Bear  
57%
29%
  Percentage of time spent in Buy/Sell signals
Buy  
53%
75%
Sell  
47%
25%
  Percentage of Up/Down days
Up  
51%
55%
Down  
49%
45%
  Percentage of time spent in TimingCube Quadrants
Quadrant 1 (Bull/Buy)  
35%
64%
Quadrant 2 (Bull/Sell)  
8%
7%
Quadrant 3 (Bear/Sell)  
39%
17%
Quadrant 4 (Bear/Buy)  
18%
12%


Over the very long-term (the entire twentieth century as measured by the Dow Jones Industrial index from 1900 to 2000) the market was in a bull market 65% of the time and a bear market 35%. This average contrasts nicely with the swings we have experienced more recently. Looking at the last fifteen years, which included the uninterrupted bull run of the 1990s, bulls where in control 71% of the time (using the Nasdaq-based EMA crossover definition for bull and bear markets we introduced in the October 31, 2003 TTS editorial). During the last five years which featured the bursting of the high-tech bubble, the picture has reversed with the bears in charge for 57% of the time (not exactly good for Buy and Holders).

Looking at our signals we see Buy conditions 75% of the time since 1989, but only 53% of the time in the last five years. The alternating of bull/bear market cycles and Buy/Sell signals has given rise to "The four market quadrants of Trend Timing" (see definition in the December 19, 2003 Update). The four-quadrants-in-a-square representation does not properly convey the notion of time which we attempt to depict in the charts below. One glance reveals the vast differences between the 5-year and 15-year periods. For the most recent phase, bulls only appeared 43% of the time (Quadrants 1 and 2) but, for the longer 15-year span, the reverse was true with a broad 71% domination. You can also readily spot the fact that the market's two strong natural conditions, Bull/Buy and Bear/Sell, tend to be in place much longer than the weaker corrective phases represented by the Bull/Sell and Bear/Buy quadrants.

The bottom line we derive from these market history facts is that bull and bear markets alternate at different times and durations, and that following the trend can put you on the winning side of the market more of the time.

Back to the Top of the page


FAQ of the Week
Question: How can I compare TimingCube with similar services?

We are frequently asked by prospective subscribers, and even existing ones, about how we stack-up with respect to this or that other investment service. At TimingCube we are proud of the service we provide and confident that our subscribers receive good value (many of you tell us so), and we encourage comparison with competitive products. We are not the oldest, not the largest, maybe not even the best, but for obvious impartiality reasons we never mention or discuss the merits of other companies' offerings. We feel our readers are well qualified to compare and make their own conclusions and, to that end, we are happy to facilitate their research with the following guidelines and resources.

Finding comparable services. It is of course not our desire to point you away to competitors, but we figure to gain from comparison, and if you are going to check other services out anyway, we would love to help. There are thousands of investment newsletters but thanks to the Internet you can easily narrow the field. For example, do a search for "timing QQQ" and you get a long list of matches, accompanied by an almost as long list of advertisements. Note that the higher a company comes out on a search (not the ads), the more established their Web presence tends to be.

Time in existence. This industry is packed with fly-by-night operations, as well as chronic hit and run artists who function for a number of months milking customers and disappear after short-term results fail to deliver as promised, only to reappear morphed under another name for the next scam. Reputable companies will clearly state their history, but independent evidence always helps.

Credentials and reputation. It should be easy to find who the founders and principals behind the company are. If their identities and credentials are not readily available, be wary. Independent evidence of their leadership role in the industry can also be found in published articles, interviews and speaking engagements. Our Virtual Media Kit on the "Press Room" page contains our background information, and the "In the News" page lists many press and media mentions.

Results. This happens to be the favorite target for tampering so you need to make sure that the results are fully verifiable. Are they live or backtested? Are each and every trade listed and can you reproduce the stated results? Maybe the most impartial way to assess results is through independent third-party organizations such as The Hulbert Financial Digest or TimerTrac which, in addition to plotting the performance, lists every signal they observed. How far back has the system been tested? Even if a company does not have twenty five years of live history (businesses have to be started after all) publishing backtested performance over long periods of time can provide higher levels of confidence.

Success. Of course nothing speaks like success, but how do you measure it? Do you go by how many clients a service has? Not all companies publish these numbers (we have about 4,800 subscribers). One of the better ways to gauge the success of an investment service is to measure how much web traffic they generate. A very handy site for this task is http://www.alexa.com which gives the actual traffic history of any site in the world, including a ranking. You can imagine that the top ranks are occupied by "public content destinations" such as Google, Yahoo, CNN and the like. There are millions of sites. Sites such as TimingCube which are visited primarily by their subscribers for only a weekly visit do very well to place in the top 100,000 (we are about 87,000 currently). Such rankings are hard to achieve, take time and dedication and, most importantly, cannot be faked.

Warm wishes and until next week.

The TimingCube Staff

Back to the Top of the page


Follow TimingCube » Follow TimingCube on Facebook Follow TimingCube on Twitter Follow TimingCube on LinkedIn

   Turbo Model
   Results
 
   Classic Model
  
   Site Map
   Glossary

TimingCube® is a registered trademark of Fraser Partners, LLC.
Disclaimer/Terms of Use    Privacy Policy
©2001- Fraser Partners, LLC
  All Rights Reserved.