|
Signal Update
|
 |
Current
Signal Performance as of
Signal
Type |
Trade
Date |
Return
since issued |
|
|
|
World |
U.S. |
|
Nasdaq
100
(QQQQ)
|
Russell
2000
(IWM)
|
S&P
500
(SPY)
|
|

|
Market Update |
 |
Stocks continued
to retreat this week, challenging their 2008 lows. China's announcement
of a $586 billion stimulus plan initially sent stocks higher
after Monday's open. A set of disappointing corporate news,
such as Circuit City filing for bankruptcy protection and the
announcement by DHL that it will lay off 9,500 workers, caused
the major averages to reverse course and finish the day in the
red. Stocks kept falling the next two days after companies such
as Starbucks, Best Buy and Macy's reported poor results or issued
disappointing guidance in the face of a weakening economy. Selling
intensified after Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson announced
that the government would now buy equity stakes in troubled
banks instead of simply buying their bad loans as the original
bailout plan called for. Following a sales warning from Intel,
stocks plunged again Thursday, causing all main indexes except
the Dow Jones Industrial Average
to undercut their October lows.
Then, right after the Dow fell to the 8,000 mark, stocks turned
around in stunning fashion to finish with huge gains on heavy
volume, causing the Nasdaq Composite to recover from a 4.7%
intraday loss to close the session 6.5% higher. The major averages
relinquished a good chunk of their gains Friday during the last
hour of trading. The sell-off was attributed in part to hedge
fund investors withdrawing their money ahead of a November 15
deadline.
The Nasdaq 100 (QQQQ), S&P 500 (SPY) and Russell 2000 (IWM)
respectively lost 7.09%, 7.71% and 9.84% on the week. All 3
ETFs remain located well below both their 50-day and 200-day
exponential moving averages (EMAs).
For its part, our World portfolio posted a
6.60% loss this week.
The portfolio consists of the 5 top-ranked world ETFs as of
November 7, which marked the beginning of the current 4-week
holding period. Please note that since we now have an active
Cash signal, the
World approach calls for selling your holdings
if you follow the "Long Only" or "Long
and Short" strategy. Only if you follow the "Buy
and Rebalance" strategy should you remain invested
in the top 5 ETFs, as the strategy calls for staying invested
at all times. Please go to the "Our
Service" page for all the details.
We want to point out that, despite the tremendous volatility
and wild gyrations we have experienced recently, the S&P 500
and the Dow are little changed from their October 10 levels,
clearly showing that cash has been the best place to be in since
then.
Our current Cash
signal remains in effect.

|
Trend Timing School |
 |
The
ETF Advantage
The explosion in popularity of Exchange Traded Funds, or ETFs,
is a small study in the power of compounding interest. In this
case, it's the interest of investors who recognized the potential
and advantages of adding these investment gems to their portfolios.
Right at the turn of the century, ETFs started to draw savvy
investors. In 1999, there were 30 registered ETFs in the marketplace.
By mid-November 2008, 805 ETFs with combined assets in excess
of $550 billion were officially listed according to Yahoo Finance,
as compared to $1 billion 10 years earlier.
ETFs are index funds listed on a stock exchange. Like mutual
funds, they hold shares in a broad spectrum of companies or
commodities. But, unlike mutual funds which are typically priced
once per day at the close, ETFs can be bought or sold at any
time during the trading day just like any other stock. What's
more, they are competitively priced and their fees are low.
They are not subject to the "frequent trading rules" that brokers
increasingly enforce on mutual funds.
For our money, ETFs are the most practical and economical investment
vehicles for implementing a trend following system. ETFs are
extremely convenient and easy to use. They can be bought and
sold exactly the same way as any stock using identical techniques
such as limit and stop orders, short sales and margin trading.
What's more, a growing number of ETFs now have options, or contracts
which convey the right to buy or sell shares at a set price
before a specific date.
But not all ETFs are ideal for trend following. Closed-End Funds
(CEFs) which are frequently lumped in the general ETF category
have a fixed number of shares. Their price is influenced by
the demand for the fund itself, which means it can be considerably
different than the price of the underlying assets. For a trend
following investment approach which follows the broad stock
market, fixed-income funds that pay interest by investing in
various debt instruments like bonds or those that invest in
currencies don't work well either. The third category to avoid
is ETFs that invest in commodities like oil and gold, currencies
or interest rates, because these will not generally correlate
well with stock market based trends we follow.
So that leaves us with equity index ETFs, our favorites for
that portion of your portfolio devoted to trend following. These
are diversified, transparent, liquid and affordable, all of
which appeal to a trend following investor.
Diversification
As the name indicates, equity index ETFs track a particular
stock market index by investing primarily in the securities
that constitute that index. When you buy an ETF share, you buy
the entire basket of stocks making up the index. That's automatic
diversification. How much diversification you actually get varies
greatly, because while some indices represent broad markets
-- such as the Nasdaq Composite
-- others are extremely narrow.
There is an index and an ETF for just about every sector, type
and geography of the market. Some track industry-specific indexes,
like the SOXX
index, a proxy for the semiconductor industry, and the Dow Jones
Utilities
, which only holds 15 large utility companies. Others differentiate
themselves by value or growth company type or the size of their
constituent companies, (small, mid or large-cap). There are
also many region or country-specific funds.
But keep in mind it is easier (and we believe a more accurate
gauge) to observe trends in broad market funds. The more narrow
and specific a fund is, the less likely it is to exhibit good
correlation with the broad markets and with a trend following
model.
Transparency, predictability and safety
By definition an index fund has the clearly-identified objective
of tracking a market index. There is no question as to what
it invests in or what performance to expect in relation to the
index, unlike actively-managed Closed-End Funds and mutual funds.
ETFs are highly-regulated and scrutinized, so they're less prone
to all the illegal practices and fraud that have plagued the
mutual fund industry. The market risk of an ETF -- or how much
you can lose -- is identical to the index it tracks and the
type of underlying assets. Sector funds or emerging market funds
can present extremely high risks. There is also a variety of
short and leveraged ETFs that appeared for the first time in
2006 which let you approximate the effects of shorting the market
and/or investing on margin. For example, there are funds which
have as daily objective to achieve twice or twice the inverse
of the performance of the index they track, with all the added
risk that entails. Still, more and more advisors and money managers
who follow traditional investing methods are looking at such
ETFs as a hedge for portfolios.
Liquidity
Frequently viewed as a major advantage of individual stocks
and mutual funds, liquidity varies widely from one ETF to the
next mostly as a function of how long the fund has been in existence
and how broad or specialized it is. Normally, an investment
that is thinly traded with high spreads and volatility, is considered
illiquid... a bad thing if you are a traditional investor.
In contrast, the way ETFs work makes them immune to certain
aspects of illiquidity. Contrary to popular belief, since ETF
shares can be created and unwound in real time, the liquidity
of an ETF is not related to its daily trading volume but rather
to the liquidity of the stocks comprised in the index.
In addition, ETFs typically have small spreads (generally less
than 1%) because market makers, specialists and arbitrageurs
all interact and compete to effectively flatten the premiums
and discounts to fair market value.
Still, despite these advantages, we highly recommend sticking
with ETFs that are highly liquid, particularly if you are going
long and short in your trend following strategy. Regardless
of how liquid the underlying companies are, an illiquid ETF
makes it nearly impossible to short because your broker will
not have any shares to loan you. And in the event he does, he
has the right to "call away" those shares at any time, which
most likely will be bad timing for you.
Cost
While you still have to pay transaction fees (commissions) to
your broker when you trade ETFs, they are much more economical
to own than mutual funds. ETF expenses are, on average, more
than seven times lower than both actively managed and index
mutual funds. As an example, a large popular fund such as SPY
has an annual expense ratio of just 0.08 percent compared to
an average expense ratio of 1.4 percent for mutual funds.
Despite having to pay taxes on the capital gains on a trade,
ETFs offer other significant tax advantages. Because of a loophole
in the regulations, the purchases and sales of underlying securities
by institutional investors to create or unwind ETF shares are
defined as "in-kind trades." That means they're not taxed like
the trades executed by a mutual fund manager. For some mutual
funds, such taxes can amount to more than 10 percent of the
fund's assets per year.
Despite our enthusiasm for ETFs, this is not a blanket endorsement
of the industry. The pitfalls are definitely out there. We are
the first to say that all ETFs are NOT created equal and we
strongly recommend staying with the most popular and largest
of the funds, in particular the ones that track the broadest
market indices.

|
FAQ of the Week |
 |
Question:
Do you ensure confidentiality of your clients data?
The answer is an unqualified yes. Unlike many of our so-called
competitors in the investment newsletter industry, we do not
sell or share any personal subscriber information. Our Privacy
Policy is very simple and very strict, TimingCube
and its affiliates will never disclose your information to a
third party. In addition to being protected against misuse,
the information is fully protected against theft on secure servers.
Warm
wishes and until next week.
The TimingCube
Staff
|
|
|