Follow TimingCube » Follow TimingCube on Facebook Follow TimingCube on Twitter Follow TimingCube on LinkedIn
Turbo Model




Signal Update
Current Signal Performance as of
Signal Type
Trade Date
Return since issued
World
U.S.
Nasdaq 100
(QQQQ)

Russell 2000
(IWM)
S&P 500
(SPY)

Back to the Top of the page


Market Update
With investors in wait-and-see mode ahead of the midterm elections next week, stocks were little changed over the five-day span. If the major averages opened higher Monday on a lower dollar, they relinquished most of their gains after the U.S. currency rebounded, leaving the S&P 500 with a 0.2% gain by day's end. A further rise in the dollar caused initial weakness during the next session, but stocks quickly recovered to yield the Nasdaq Composite a 0.3% gain. Similar action could be observed Wednesday as the main indexes trimmed early losses to finish the day almost unchanged. Better-than-expected weekly jobless claims data provided an initial boost for stocks Thursday, but the gains quickly turned to losses before another reversal allowed the major averages to close once more with modest gains. GDP numbers released Friday showed that the economy expanded at an annual pace of just 2% in Q3, raising expectations that the Federal Reserve will take bold action to boost the economy at next week's meeting. The main indexes remained stuck in a tight range all day to finish near the flat line, closing out a strong month of October for equities.

The Nasdaq 100 (QQQQ) and S&P 500 (SPY) respectively gained 1.05% and 0.12% over the five-day span while the Russell 2000 (IWM) was basically unchanged. All three ETFs remain located above both their 50-day and 200-day exponential moving averages (EMAs).

For its part, our World portfolio posted a 1.02% loss this week. The portfolio consists of the 5 top-ranked world ETFs as of October 8, which marked the beginning of the current 4-week holding period.

Our current Buy signal remains in effect.
Back to the Top of the page


Trend Timing School
Is volatility the market's crystal ball?

Our preferred volatility indicator is the Chicago Board Options Exchange volatility index, also known as VIX, and as you can see on Chart 1 below, it has been on a steady decline over the last two years, with the exception of a quick rebound in May of this year. Going by what is said and written in the media and in the investment advisory community one might easily jump to the conclusion that this volatility decline should coincide with the end of the recent market rally. We do not know what markets will do in the future but we do know, as we will endeavor to demonstrate in this article, that a low volatility level has never been a reliable indicator of market tops.

Chart 1: VIX and S&P 500 over the last 2 years

VIX and S&P 500 over the last 2 years

Volatility is a measure of changes in price expressed in percentage terms, without regard to direction. It is frequently used as a market risk indicator. Since future volatility (and the related price changes) is only known when it has become historic volatility, benchmarks have been created which use the prices of stock index options as a way to estimate expected future volatility. Introduced in 1993, the VIX has been considered by many to be the world's premier barometer of investor sentiment and market volatility. With a major facelift in 2003, by changing the way it is calculated and switching to options on the S&P 500 instead of those on the S&P 100, and by offering the first-ever trading in VIX futures during 2004, VIX has become ever more popular.

The erroneous popular wisdom of equating low VIX readings with a bearish sign stems from the following logic. High or rising volatility corresponds to an increasing sense of risk which culminates in the extreme fear typically seen at market bottoms, and in perfect contrarian fashion a low or decreasing volatility supposedly reveals investors being too complacent as is usually the case at market tops.

As usual a picture is worth a thousand words, and to that effect Chart 2 displays the VIX from 1990 to the present day, overlaid on the S&P 500 Index as a reflection of market price movements.

Chart 2: VIX and S&P 500 over the last 20 years

VIX and S&P 500 over the last 20 years

The first deduction we can make from the chart is that absolute volatility readings have no bearing on market trend. Markets have risen during times of low volatility (e.g. 1995), as they have with high VIX readings (e.g. 1999), and the same can be said of declining markets. As one would expect, the higher the volatility, the larger the distance between price highs and lows, which is what volatility is all about. The best example of course if the market crash of 2008 where the VIX reached an all time high of 80.86, corresponding to a drop of 47% for the S&P 500. However, absolute reading of the volatility index does not help spotting market tops. For instance, the top of the internet bubble in March 2000 does not correspond to a volatility bottom. The same is true of the market top preceding the subprime debacle of 2008.

So instead of absolute VIX readings it must be relative VIX values, or changes in volatility which show the way, right? Wrong. What about the ratio of the index and the VIX (e.g. S&P 500 divided by VIX) which some advisors claim to be the magic formula? Nope. In fact, Mark Hulbert, the well respected publisher of the Hulbert Financial Digest, has done extensive analysis on this subject and concluded some time back that there simply is no historical support for the notion that a low VIX indicates that a market top is near, and that while high VIX readings often have come before market rallies, the same also appears to be true for low VIX readings.

What the chart above reveals however, is that large upward VIX spikes consistently coincide with market lows as can be seen repeatedly, including the one that resulted from the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. A well known behavior of markets is that declines are generally much more explosive than increases. Markets can drop further over a shorter period of time than they rise, as exemplified by the "Black Monday" on October 19, 1987 when the Dow Jones Industrials dropped by a whopping 22.6%. This primarily has to do with human self-preservation psychology in which fear and panic are much stronger emotions than enthusiasm and excitement. Even during manias driving market bubbles skyward, volatility does not come close to the spikes seen during bear market declines and crashes. As a matter of fact, the chart reveals that there are no downward volatility spikes.

As Trend Timers we have profited in times of both high and low volatility. Significant bear markets and crashes coinciding with volatility spikes where trend timing help us protect our assets (going to Cash), or even profit from them using Sell signals, resulting in a much more satisfactory approach than the traditional Buy and Hold approach. Just because we enjoy such periods of extreme volatility does not mean we can use the VIX index as a reliable market trend predictor. For that, we will continue using the market itself and follow the trends it exhibits.
Back to the Top of the page


FAQ of the Week
Question: How do I update my personal information and preferences?

After you log in, go to the "My Profile" page where your personal data and preferences reside. You can update any of the information such as changing your password, your credit card number or expiration date, or adding a new e-mail address. Whenever you make changes or add information make sure to save them by clicking the "Update" button at the bottom of the page.

Please note that the "My Profile" page also allows you to check your subscription status. To do so, just click the corresponding button located at the top of the page.

Warm wishes and until next week.

The TimingCube Staff
Back to the Top of the page
 

Follow TimingCube » Follow TimingCube on Facebook Follow TimingCube on Twitter Follow TimingCube on LinkedIn

   Turbo Model
   Results
 
   Classic Model
  
   Site Map
   Glossary

TimingCube® is a registered trademark of Fraser Partners, LLC.
Disclaimer/Terms of Use    Privacy Policy
©2001- Fraser Partners, LLC
  All Rights Reserved.