|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Celebrating
one year of
World Index Ranking!
Current
Signal Performance as of
Signal
Type |
Trade
Date |
Index |
Return
since issued |
|
|
|
Nasdaq 100 |
|
Russell 2000 |
|
S&P 500 |
|

After last Friday's drop caused by a much weaker-than-expected jobs
report, many on Wall Street expected the sell-off to resume in earnest
this week. The opposite happened, as stocks managed to recover all of
last week's losses and then some. Following last Friday's weakness, the
major indexes started Monday by moving lower but were able to stabilize
and reverse course to close either flat or with minor losses on the day.
Following their European counterparts, stocks posted solid gains
Tuesday, with the Nasdaq Composite
jumping 1.5%. Despite higher oil prices and weakness in the
semiconductor arena, markets held their own to remain largely
unchanged Wednesday. Bullish news on General Motors and McDonald's
boosted large cap issues and helped stocks post more gains Thursday.
Following a disappointing retail sales report, all major indexes
opened lower Friday but then proved their resilience by moving
back up to close in positive territory. Trading volume was light all week, in part due to the Jewish Rosh Hashana holiday and the fact that many investors simply chose to stay put, waiting for the Fed's decision on interest rates next week.
The Nasdaq 100 and
S&P 500 respectively gained 2.17% and 2.11% on the
week. Both indexes are now located above their respective 50-day and
200-day exponential moving averages (EMAs). As for the
Russell 2000 , it
posted a 0.99% weekly gain. The index remains below its 200-day EMA and
is therefore still lagging.
For its part, our World Index Ranking portfolio
underperformed its US counterparts this week as it gained a
modest 0.20%. The
portfolio consists of the 5 top-ranked world indexes as of August
17, which marked the beginning of the current 4-week holding
period. The World Index Ranking portfolio is
being rebalanced today, as the current 4-week holding period
is now over.
Our current Buy
signal remains in effect.

Celebrating
one year of World Index Ranking
To mark the 1 year anniversary of the World Index Ranking,
which falls officially on the 15th of September, we largely
dedicate today's Trend Timing School article to the system and
a review of its first year track record.
The primary motivation for developing and adding the World
Index Ranking system to our service was to participate
in the strongest world markets, regardless of geography. For
those not yet familiar with the momentum based World
Index Ranking system and its strategies, they all revolve
around the notion of buying and upgrading the strongest world
markets based on the relative strength of their indexes. There
are currently 27 separate broad market indexes in the ranking
(7 of which are U.S. markets), and we focus on the top 5. Upgrading
takes place every 4 weeks by rebalancing the 5 portfolio ETF
positions to match the top 5 markets in the latest ranking.
This is the basic World Index Ranking Buy and Rebalance
strategy which is always fully invested and completely ignores
the timing model. When overlaying the basic momentum approach
with the TimingCube
strategies we obtain the World Index Ranking Long Only
and Long and Short strategies. For a detailed
review of the system and its strategies, please read "World
Index Ranking".
As we add a full year of live track record to our backtested
performance numbers we have a good pretext to assess how we
did. To do so we refer to the 1 year performance table below
which compares the three World Index Ranking
strategies with U.S. indexes in both timed strategies and with
buy and hold. Since the 1 year stretch has for the most part
been a continuation of the now nearly 5 year old bull market
in equities, Long Only and Long and
Short timing strategies have clearly underperformed.
The two whipsaws experienced by our Model this year did not
help either. For the three U.S. indexes, the timing strategies
resulted in losses which lagged buy and hold. Owing mostly to
the strength of the markets targeted by the World Index
Ranking, even with the Long Only and
Long and Short strategies and their ill fated
signals, the top 5 world markets substantially outperformed
their U.S. counterparts with gains of 18.26%
and 9.83%
respectively. In this generally bullish environment the uncontested
winner has been the World Index Ranking Buy and Rebalance
strategy with a 1 year gain of 28.79%.
World Index Ranking 1 year performance comparison*
| |
Long
Only |
Long
& Short |
Buy
& Rebalance |
Buy
& Hold |
World Index Ranking
Top 5 |
18.26% |
9.83%
|
28.79%
|
na |
Nasdaq 100 |
6.34%
|
-0.91% |
na
|
22.57%
|
Russell 2000 |
-6.05%
|
-14.59%
|
na
|
7.41%
|
S&P 500 |
0.37%
|
-4.68%
|
na
|
12.47%
|
| *
From the open on 9/18/2006 to the close on 9/14/2007 |
For those who believe that published results can never quite
be achieved by the individual subscriber because of commissions
and trading delays, we have good news. Recently, the U.S. dollar
kindly chipped-in for higher real gains than what we publish.
Since we actually invest in ETFs and not the indexes themselves,
our positions experience the exchange rate fluctuations of the
respective currencies versus the U.S. dollar. In the past year,
the U.S. Dollar Index lost 7.6%, which has translated into similar
extra gains for the International ETFs, as compared to the indexes
tracked in our results. Some currencies did even better. For
example, since the Brazilian Bovespa Index has been
an almost permanent fixture of our Top 5 portfolio this past
year, we note that the Brazilian Real has gained 12% against
the U.S. dollar, and thus added to the Brazilian ETF's
already juicy returns.
The second objective for the World Index Ranking
service is diversification. The initial angle was to provide
International diversification for our previously U.S. centered
strategies, but our research indicated that the momentum based
approach also provided welcome strategy diversification, as
was confirmed with this past year's strong returns of the World
Index Ranking Buy and Rebalance strategy as compared
to those produced by timing the U.S. indexes.
Just as we never recommended investing everything in long and
short timing strategies, we are not now saying you should drop
all timing strategies in favor of buying and rebalancing the
World Index Ranking. Diversification is the
key word. The weakness of momentum strategies is that when markets
turn down, their holdings will suffer as well. Our testing for
the bear market years of 2001 and 2002 shows the World
Index Ranking Buy and Rebalance strategy lost 1.29%
and 12.05% respectively, as compared to -12.97% and -23.26%
for the S&P 500. Despite doing better than a buy and hold strategy
during the bear market, being diversified with a portion of
our portfolio following a Long and Short timing
strategy would perform substantially better.
Together with our plea for diversification, we would be remiss
not to mention the fact that International investing does provide
additional challenges and risks, and we highly recommend reading
"What are the risks of
international investing?".

Question:
Where can I find historical trades?
We frequently get this question from curious subscribers wanting
to know past trades and positions for the World Index
Ranking. This information can be found on the "Results"
page, in the "Performance with World Index Ranking"
section. At the bottom of the section, right below the "Yearly
returns", click the "Historical Rankings"
button for all the rankings of every period back to 12/15/2000.
The table does not list the actual trades, but it lists the
Top 5 positions (and all the other ones as well) for every 4
week rebalance period. It lets you reconstruct the results of
our sample portfolio. Some like to "cut and paste" this information
into a spreadsheet to analyze. Daily and weekly historical price
data can be obtained from Yahoo! Finance (it is their ticker
symbols we use to designate the indexes), or any other data
provider. Others like to study which indexes led the pack at
what times, how frequently and for how long. Yet others like
to identify the weak markets at the bottom of the rankings,
or the ones making large moves, up or down, from week to week.
All the information is there for you to analyze.
Warm wishes and until next week.
The TimingCube
Staff
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbo Model
|
|
|
|
Classic Model
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|