A
Cash signal was issued this week!
The Cash
signal was issued Thursday September 4, 2008 after the close of
the market. Read more about it in the "Market Update"
below.
Current
Signal Performance as of
Signal
Type |
Trade
Date |
Return
since issued |
|
|
|
World |
U.S. |
|
Nasdaq
100
(QQQQ)
|
Russell
2000
(IWM)
|
S&P
500
(SPY)
|
|

It has been a horrendous holiday-shortened week for the markets as all
major averages broke down, in effect terminating the uptrend that had
been in place since mid-July. With oil prices dropping almost $6 per
barrel, stocks initially rose Tuesday, taking the S&P 500 1.6% higher
intraday. The gains quickly evaporated, however, as the market turned
around to close with losses on brisk volume. Weakness in shares of
semiconductor companies spilled over to the tech sector Wednesday and
caused a 0.7% daily loss for the Nasdaq Composite
, with the other indexes performing slightly better. Stocks
plummeted in earnest the next day on heavy trade, with all major
averages losing 3% or more. Investors were spooked by disappointing
August retail sales and an unexpected jump in weekly unemployment
claims. The rapid degradation of market action in just a few
days caused our Model to issue a Cash
signal after the close Thursday. Please note that a Cash
signal was issued instead of a Sell
because oversold readings within the Model indicate that a rebound
is as likely as further deterioration at this point. Stocks
continued their fall early on Friday, after the government announced
that the unemployment rate reached 6.1% in August, the highest
level since late 2003. The main indexes then proceeded to regain
some of the lost ground, allowing the S&P 500 to finish in the
black while the Nasdaq Composite closed the session with only
a modest loss. The rebound was certainly in large part due to
short-covering, a phenomenon often seen during market downtrends.
For the week, the Nasdaq 100 (QQQQ), Russell 2000 (IWM) and S&P 500
(SPY) respectively lost 5.79%, 3.02% and 3.39%. All 3 ETFs are now
located below both their 50-day and 200-day exponential moving averages
(EMAs).
For its part, our World portfolio posted a
5.77% loss this week.
The portfolio consists of the 5 top-ranked world ETFs as of
August 15, which marked the beginning of the current 4-week
holding period. Please note that since we now have an active
Cash signal, the
World approach calls for selling your holdings
if you follow the "Long Only" or "Long
and Short" strategy. Only if you follow the "Buy
and Rebalance" strategy should you remain invested
in the top 5 ETFs, as the strategy calls for staying invested
at all times. Please go to the "Our
Service" page for all the details.
We now have a Cash
signal in effect.

Catastrophes
and stock market trends
With
the approaching sad anniversary of 9/11, so is the hype in
the media; fortunately this year the US presidential race
is taking over the headlines, removing some of the pressure
and the resulting fears. History is littered with catastrophic
events, natural or man-made, but also with the failures and
missed opportunities of people too frightened about the future
to live their lives to the fullest.
As investors it is not unusual to try to imagine a range of
possible scenarios, most of them bad, and try to anticipate
their impact on the markets and our holdings. Catastrophobia
(don't bother looking it up in the dictionary, we just thought
it sounded cute) is a somewhat cyclical obsession.
Conspiracy theorists routinely claim that the government warnings
and the ensuing media response is orchestrated to keep the
masses busy worrying about some external threat instead of
their own day to day realities. Cynics assert that the reason
for the catastrophe hype is that fear sells, that the news
media are all over it to boost ratings, and that advertisers
exploit it to sell you everything from financial newsletters,
insurance, gold coins and guns. And yes, with this editorial
we are to some extent guilty of worsening the fear monger
statistics. But we mean well!
Regardless of why this is currently a hot topic, the only
certainty is that sooner or later the next tragedy will hit.
Whether it is an earth quake, an epidemic, a political assassination,
or the much predicted terror strike, we know it will be horrific.
Markets have a long history of dealing with crisis of all
sorts, and typically they respond extremely well. So what
is the impact on our investments likely to be? Study of past
incidents shows that most events trigger an immediate irrational
market response, typically a panic sell-off. Then, over surprisingly
short periods, investors realize that they and the rest of
the world will survive and overcome the devastation, and the
markets recover to resume the predominant trend that existed
before the event took place. Let us review a couple of examples.
Probably not too many subscribers can remember that far back,
but the early sixties were as tense a period as the world
had seen in almost twenty years. In 1963, the United States
had just recently seen the end of the Cuban missile crisis
when the U.S. involvement in the war in South-East Asia started
to seriously heat-up due in large part to the coup in South
Vietnam. On November 22, 1963 the assassination of President
John F. Kennedy sent shock waves throughout the world and
the stock market plunging. However, as devastating and far
reaching as the tragedy was, by the end of the year the markets
had recovered all of their losses, and were up over 20% a
year later.
Still fresh in everyone's memories, the unprecedented terrorist
strikes of September 11, 2001 had a massive impact in terms
of lost lives and financial assets, and a long-lasting disruptive
effect by signaling the beginning of a new type of global
armed conflict. Considering the enormity of the events, the
markets reacted in a predictable and one might even say orderly
fashion. Ironically, the fact that the most visible blow took
place in New York City, not far from Wall Street, may have
helped by forcing the markets closed for almost a week - action
that may well be repeated in the future regardless of where
the next event occurs. After the markets re-opened on September
17th, a measured sell-off reached its peak (about -16%) within
five trading days, and was entirely erased within one month
of the event to the day. Since our Model already had us in
a Sell mode when
the attacks happened, TimingCube
subscribers fared well with the recovery rally triggering
a very profitable Buy
signal on October 3rd.
The first key observation about catastrophes is that by definition
they cannot be accurately predicted. Maybe this is why Nostradamus,
the world's most famous prophet of disasters, is not exactly
renowned as a great stock market prognosticator.
The second valuable reflection is that such calamities tend
to have a short-lived effect on the stock market. They can
cause a temporary plunge but they do not change the underlying
market trend. Yes, there is no telling how deep the initial
sell-off might be. If it exceeds 9% (or 15%) from our entry
point, as measured by the Nasdaq Composite, our Cash
signal will act as a safety valve, if we are in a Buy
mode at the time. If we are in Sell
mode the brunt of the initial market response would favor
our short position.
In summary, catastrophic events are inevitable but they are
not predictable and they are unlikely to have a lasting effect
on the markets. The enduring damage (both financial and emotional)
of constantly expecting a disaster and being paralyzed on
the side-line far outweighs the risk of being invested when
it finally happens. Thus, the best course of action for us
Trend Timers is to ignore fear and remember that the trend
is our friend.

Question:
I recently saw the TimingCube
signal in a public forum. Is this OK?
First of all we want to thank the subscribers that help us preserve
the value of our wealth-building system by reporting mentions
of our signal in online forums or even in other financial newsletters.
As these loyal subscribers know, it is NOT
OK to divulge the current signal to anyone,
anytime or anywhere.
Any disclosure to a third-party is a direct infringement of
the Disclaimer/Terms
of Use all subscribers agree to when they sign-up for the
service. Giving away the signal is not only unfair to all subscribers
that pay for the service, but making the information public
can directly undermine the effectiveness of the Model and negatively
affect its performance. TimingCube
actively monitors many online forums and publications and aggressively
pursues any offenders we find. We can always use the help of
a few thousand additional eyes and ears to insure no infringement
will go unnoticed.
Don't get us wrong, we just love it when subscribers mention
TimingCube
in public forums. Especially if they say good things about us!
Warm wishes and until next week.
The TimingCube
Staff
|
|