|
| |
 |
|
Signal Update |
 |
Current
Signal Performance as of
Signal
Type |
Trade
Date |
Return
since issued |
|
|
|
World |
U.S. |
|
Nasdaq
100
(QQQQ)
|
Russell
2000
(IWM)
|
S&P
500
(SPY)
|
|

|
Market Update |
 |
After an initial plunge Monday, stocks rallied for the rest of the week, sending the S&P 500 to its highest close since October of last year. Monday's weakness was largely due to a poor showing by asian markets that spilled over to the U.S. indexes, resulting in a 2.8% daily loss for the Nasdaq Composite. It did not take long for stocks to rebound as a set of positive news turned the mood around Tuesday: several retailers beat earnings forecasts while home construction and core inflation readings came in better than the market anticipated. Buying appetite returned, helping the Nasdaq recover half of the previous day's losses. It was only the beginning as stocks kept rising for the next three sessions to finish the week on a strong note. Investors' renewed optimism was fueled by news that manufacturing activity, as measured by the Philadelphia Fex index, rose for the first time in 12 months and that existing homes sales jumped 7.2% in July, marking the fourth straight monthly increase. Fed chairman Ben Bernanke also helped by stating that the economy is on the verge of recovery.
The Russell 2000 (IWM), S&P 500 (SPY) and Nasdaq 100 (QQQQ) respectively gained 3.08%, 2.16% and 1.67% over the five-day span. All three ETFs remain located above both their 50-day and 200-day exponential moving averages (EMAs).
For its part, our World portfolio trailed its
U.S. counterparts this week as it posted a 0.29%
loss. The portfolio consists of the 5 top-ranked world ETFs
as of August 14, which marked the beginning of the current 4-week
holding period.
Our current Buy
signal remains in effect.

|
Trend Timing School |
 |
Order
types
Whenever we go through a signal, the general question of which
type of order is best comes up. Our Web site states that to
achieve the full benefit from the signal, you should act on
it as soon as possible. Since signals are issued in the evening
after the markets close, your orders should optimally be placed
before the market opens on the next trading day. If your selected
investment vehicle is an ETF, the order should be executed
at the open. The crux of the issue is the realization that
market orders seldom get filled exactly at the official open
price. The natural reaction is to first be suspicious of your
broker and to blame them for the difference. The next logic
step is to look for ways to avoid the issue by using limit
orders instead. But are limit orders really better?
Note that this entire discussion does not apply to trading
mutual funds. Since mutual fund trades are all filled at the
same price, the closing price, there are no market or limit
orders (some fund families, e.g. Rydex, offer a second daily
execution slot).
Taking the most recent Buy
signal we issued on the evening of April 2, 2009 and QQQQ
as an example, we can see that the official open price on April
3 was $32.01. Most of us with market orders entered prior to
the open bought at a slightly higher price, and from what you
tell us it sounds like many of these orders got filled in the
neighborhood of $32.07. In this particular instance, had you
placed a limit order at $31.72 (the previous closing price)
it would not have been filled as the intra-day low on April
3 turned out to be higher ($31.79). If instead of placing an
order prior to the market open (market or limit) you had waited
to observe the market's real-time action during the day, you
might have gotten very lucky and snatched that intra-day low
price of $31.79. The problem with this approach is that the
market could have just as well gone up steadily during the day
and you would have ended up without a trade, or have been forced
to take a position at a substantially higher price to avoid
being left stranded on the side lines.
Let's review and compare the two types of orders discussed
here:
A market order is to buy or sell immediately
(or as soon as the corresponding market opens) at the best
price possible. It guarantees the order will be executed,
but because orders placed when the markets are closed are
subject to market conditions existing when the markets next
open, it does not guarantee the price. A buy order is typically
filled near the ask price, and a sell order near the bid price.
Note that some brokers also provide an option to specify "On
the open" as the time in force for securities traded on auction
exchanges such as the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). There
is no such thing as "On the open" orders for electronic exchanges
such as the Nasdaq or Over-the-Counter (OTC) markets. Because
of how trading actually takes place, "On the open" orders
still do not guarantee you will get the exact open price.
By law, brokers are obligated to give each client the best
possible order execution and they now have to report to the
SEC on their trade execution quality. This largely eliminates
some of the abuse that used to take place, but it still does
not guarantee you will get the exact open price because of
the many different ways an order can get filled.
A limit order specifies the maximum you are
willing to pay for a buy order, or the minimum price you want
to receive for a sell order. It guarantees a minimum/maximum
price, but it does not guarantee execution. If the market moves
against you from the open, your limit price may not be seen
and the order will remain dormant until it expires. Professional
traders frequently use limit orders to limit their risk. While
limit orders can be beneficial for low volume or highly volatile
securities, they also require time and attention to detect what
the markets are doing and make adjustments as necessary. Some
brokers also charge higher commissions for limit orders.
Order
Type |
Pros |
Cons |
Market |
Guaranteed
to fill |
Price
is not guaranteed |
Execution
speed |
Higher
exposure in fast moving and volatile markets |
Lower
cost* |
|
Limit |
Price
is guaranteed |
Can
lose the opportunity to buy |
Only
risk is that the order might not fill |
Higher
cost* |
| *Broker
dependent |
To circle back to our previous example, if you had traded 1,000
QQQQ shares with a market order and gotten the $32.07 price
on April 3, 2009, the difference with the open price would have
been a mere $60 on a $32,070 trade, or 0.19%. For us Trend Timers
with a long-term horizon and infrequent trading, such small
differences in price are largely irrelevant. For us, timely
order execution is much more important and this is why we believe
that a market order placed before the market opens is the best
approach for the vast majority of our subscribers.

|
FAQ of the Week |
 |
Question:
What is the expiration/renewal date for my subscription?
For convenience, and to avoid any unwanted interruption of service,
all of our subscriptions are automatically renewed at the end
of each paid period, unless cancelled before. You can check
your scheduled renewal (or expiration) date at any time. To
do so, go to the "My Profile" page
after you log in to the site and click on the button "Click
here to see the Current Status of My Subscription"
located at the top of the page. This will display your current
subscription status, including the type of plan you are on (e.g.
monthly or yearly) as well as the scheduled renewal/expiration
date.
Warm wishes and until next week.
The TimingCube
Staff
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|