|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Current
Signal Performance as of
Signal
Type |
Trade
Date |
Return
since issued |
|
|
|
World |
U.S. |
|
Nasdaq
100
(QQQQ)
|
Russell
2000
(IWM)
|
S&P
500
(SPY)
|
|

This week
saw stocks post solid gains and our model issue a new Buy
signal after the close Tuesday. Building up on last Friday's
action, the major averages opened higher Monday on news of better-than-expected
industrial production data in Europe. Stocks kept climbing for
most of the session but relinquished all their gains in the
last hour of trading after Moody's downgraded Greece's bonds
to junk status. In previous weeks, such a negative reversal
would have triggered further selling the next day. It was not
the case this time around, as stocks instead surged in heavy
volume Tuesday, buoyed by a strong performance from the chip
sector and a euro that hit its highest level of the month vs
the dollar. The Nasdaq Composite
gained 2.8% on the day. The solid move confirmed the improvement
of market action that started last week and resulted in the
issuance of a new Buy
signal after the close. Stocks managed to hang on to their gains
Wednesday despite disappointing data on housing starts. They
did so again the next day, as early weakness, resulting from
an increase in weekly jobless claims and a lower-than-expected
reading for the Philly Fed index of manufacturing activity,
was overcome late in the session to yield modest gains for the
major averages. Stocks finished the week with a quiet session
Friday, as the main indexes traded in a small range all day
to close modestly higher.
The Nasdaq 100 (QQQQ), Russell 2000 (IWM) and S&P 500 (SPY) respectively gained 3.30%, 2.86% and 1.87% over the five-day span. The Nasdaq 100 (QQQQ) has now recaptured its 50-day exponential moving average (EMA) while the other two ETFs rest above their 200-day EMA and just a hair below their 50-day EMA.
For its part, our World portfolio posted a
2.65% gain this week. The portfolio
consists of the 5 top-ranked world ETFs as of May 21, which
marked the beginning of the current 4-week holding period. The
World portfolio is being rebalanced today,
as the current 4-week holding period is now over.
We now have a Buy
signal in effect.

A rally's building blocks
With this week's Buy
signal, we take a look at the prospects for stocks at this time.
Our Model has simply noted that momentum has shifted from a
period of predominant selling to one where buying appears to
have the upper hand. We never know how long that buying support
will last, nor how strong it will be. However, we do know that
stocks typically climb the proverbial "wall of worry"
which led investors to flee stocks throughout the month of May.
At this point, it appears that a solid, healthy wall of worry
is firmly in place to drive stocks higher. Chart 1
shows the level of bearishness among investment newsletter publishers.
Chart 1: Bearish Sentiment: January 2007 - Present

The chart shows that bearishness among this distinguished
group is at its highest level since last summer when the economic
recovery was fully in doubt and no earnings growth had yet
been on display. The chart also shows how quickly that bearishness
changes, at least in short-term bursts.
The second arrow in the bull's quiver
could be market valuation, which is cheaper than average.
A recent investor note from Oppenheimer says the following:
"The S&P 500’s current forward multiple of
12.9x represents the lowest level for the index since early
1995. According to our analysis, market performance has been
relatively strong in all periods following similar forward
P/E levels. The S&P 500 averaged a roughly 12% 12-month
return in all periods since 1960 when the forward P/E was
between 10x and 15x."
Finally, we refer back to points we made in our Weekly
Update a couple of weeks ago (06/04/2010): 1) stocks
have only shown gains after spikes in the VIX similar to what
we saw in May, and 2) July is one of the best months of the
year for the market.
The bottom line of all this can be presented from two opposite
directions. The first is that we are in a cyclical bull market
coming out of a typical correction with a wall of worry in place
to drive stocks to at least the top of the recent price channel.
The opposite view would be that we are in a secular bear market
where P/E ratios should be lower than average
as investor angst overwhelms everything else. The bearishness
may relent temporarily. But it will come roaring right back
at the slightest news of further problems. And from a fundamental
perspective, there is no shortage of reasons to fret over the
financial state of the world - a mountain of global debt still
to be worked off in an economy that is thusfar lukewarm.
In the end, we follow the market's trend, regardless of the
underlying fundamental, sentiment, or accounting metrics. Almost
every chart shows a downtrend that has been broken after investors
stepped in to support the market at or near the February lows.
Our Model has sniffed out a change in market tone and trend.
Whether you focus on technical, fundamental, seasonal, or sentiment
indicators, there is some metric out there to support at least
a short-term rally. Hang on and let's see how this rally develops.

Question:
What is the different between "secular" and "cyclical"
markets?
We frequently reference secular and cyclical markets. Secular
trends are long-term trends lasting many years. Rising commodity
prices throughout the 2000-2010 decade (and maybe into this
decade as well) are an example of a secular trend. These trends
can be kicked off and driven by fundamental supply-demand reasons,
but are usually influenced just as heavily by investor enthusiasm
or lack thereof. It's a behavioral phenomenon to a significant
degree. The behavior eventually reaches an unsustainable peak.
Some argue that the heavy flow of money into bond funds in recent
months, despite historically low interest rates, is evidence
that the end of a secular bull market in bonds is nearing an
end. The investor enthusiasm is just overdone they claim.
Cyclical trends are more intermediate-term typically lasting
months or years. The cycles can have the same fundamental and
behavioral influences. They are just less pronounced and long-lasting.
For example, stocks are in a cyclical uptrend since March 2009.
Given the discussion above about the pervasive caution regarding
stocks, one would have little evidence to support stock investors
as being overly enthusiastic. The economic cycle should last
for at least a couple of years with stock investor enthusiasm
typically increasing as the cycle goes on. At some point, that
enthusiasm will be out-of-whack with investment prospects and
the cyclical Bull market for stocks will come crashing down.
That "crashing down" scenario seems likely because
stocks remain in a secular bear market. You see it in the reluctance
of investors to embrace stocks. You see it in the tremendous
amount of cash sitting on the sidelines earning nothing. That
is secular bear market behavior, in stark contrast to the end
of the last secular Bull market in the late 1990s when everyone
bought stocks with abandon. Within that 10-20 year secular period,
a bullish stock market cycle is underway. How long it lasts
is anyone's guess, but figure a 2-3 year ride punctuated by
fits and starts such as we have seen thusfar in 2010.
Warm wishes and until next week.
The TimingCube
Staff

|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbo Model
|
|
|
|
Classic Model
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|