Follow TimingCube » Follow TimingCube on Facebook Follow TimingCube on Twitter Follow TimingCube on LinkedIn
Turbo Model




Signal Update
Current Signal Performance as of
Signal Type
Trade Date
Index
Return since issued
Nasdaq 100
Russell 2000
S&P 500
QQQ

Cumulative Returns since First TimingCube Live Signal () as of
Index
Long Only
Long Only
with
Margin
Long & Short
Long & Short
with
Margin
Buy & Hold
Nasdaq 100
Russell 2000
S&P 500
QQQ

Note: QQQ returns are included for continuity sake.

Back to the Top of the page


Market Update
Markets bounced back significantly this week. Both the Nasdaq 100 and Russell 2000 gained 4.12% while the S&P 500 finished the week 2.48% higher. It should be noted that the bounce missed one key ingredient: volume. Volume did increase on Tuesday when indices had their most powerful move of the week, but it still remained below average, meaning that institutional investors did not show a lot of conviction and that short-covering played a big part in that move. Indices are finishing the week pretty extended. In order for the markets to move higher from here, volume needs to expand as no uptrend can be sustained without the increased participation of buyers. So far, such participation has been lacking.

Our current Sell signal remains active. The Nasdaq Composite's 10-day exponential moving average (EMA) finished the week back above the 200-day EMA, which means that we are again in Quadrant 2, defined as a Bull/Sell combination (please refer to our for more information on Trend Timing quadrants). For clarification, we need to point out that we do not use quadrants/EMA crossovers for signal generation (see the FAQ of the Week below).

Back to the Top of the page


Trend Timing School
Finding your personal comfort zone

As we wrote in the May 7, 2004 Weekly Update: "Long-term Trend Timers know that the period directly following a signal is the most challenging emotionally...", and the week just past provides us with a good example of what the markets will commonly test us with. Some of us are finding out that we do not have the stomach for wild market swings or temporary losses and maybe the strategies and investments we selected are just too aggressive for our taste. If the current mild decline feels very uncomfortable and you are tempted to bail out to avoid further losses, you are in need of an urgent adjustment

We have received a number of e-mails from subscribers expressing various levels of concern over the current market action and signal performance. The feelings range from nervous to outright hurt. Such sentiments are not only unpleasant but they are counterproductive, and as such they are one of our favorite targets for elimination. They usually stem from an unresolved divergence between our expectations and risk tolerance.

We understand your anxiety but we also know that to be a successful long-term Trend Timer you need to learn to control and minimize such conflicting emotions. Any stock market investment comes with some inherent risk in exchange for the opportunity to achieve superior returns. You can select from four strategies and various investment vehicles to "dial-in" how aggressive you want to be, but remember that potential gains tend to be proportional to the downside risks.

The real intent of formally doing your own Risk/Reward trade-off is to make peace with yourself by reconciling how much pain you are willing to accept in order to satisfy your return expectations.

Before reviewing our expectations and risk tolerance we need to do a quick sanity check to make sure we understand what Trend Timing is about:

  • Trend Timing is a long-term wealth building system. While consistently achieving index beating performance over longer periods of time, the system cannot insure positive returns over shorter periods
  • The Model detects broad market trends and lets us participate in meaningful advances and declines. We do not attempt to catch the very tops and bottoms or to exploit every little bump and dip in the markets
  • Investing in the stock market, especially with short-selling and leveraged trading, presents some risks. You can lose part of your capital
  • The more aggressive the investment strategy, the higher the downside risk


The facts about the current pullback

As highlighted in the Signal Update section above, the indices are down between -0.18% for the Russell 2000 and -2.16% for the Nasdaq 100 since we last traded on April 30, 2004. So far this is a very mild pullback not even close to being in correction territory which we define as at least a 10% drop (or increase since we are in a Sell position). Variations between the different indices are a good argument for diversification. We also understand that if you are using margin or some of the leveraged bear funds such as the ProFunds USPIX, your current paper losses could be as high as -9%. Beyond the fact that the mutual funds were bought at the market close on April 30, 2004 instead of the open for ETFs, the leveraged mutual funds can have unexpected behavior at times as we explained in the

Great expectations
When deciding which strategy - or blend of strategies - we will implement, many of us are tempted by the historically stellar results of Strategy 4, Long and Short with Margin. It seems like over most time periods the most aggressive Strategy 4 has been a run away winner. We get lulled into thinking that the historical returns will repeat year after year, and never experience losses. Yet, for most investors, concluding that all or even a large part of our portfolio should be placed in leveraged investments would be irresponsible. Before settling on the return expectation we need to understand how much heat we can stand.

Risk assessment
In order to make sure we stand a chance to achieve the anticipated returns, we should calculate what the corresponding downside risk is. To provide a practical example let's take our current Sell signal with Strategy 4. We know that from the entry point the Cash signal protects us after a drop in the Nasdaq Composite of 9%. The Nasdaq 100, other indices, and their various investment vehicles can lose more or less than the Composite. If we use margin or a leveraged fund, we are looking at a possible -18% or more. Depending on the investment vehicle and strategy used your actual losses could be higher or lower and there is no hard limit on how much stock investments could fall in a single trading day.

This simple individual exercise should help each of us settle our battle between greed and fear and help us find our sweet spot were we can feel comfortable.

Despite the recent market action against our current Sell signal, nothing has changed in the trend. The Model does not tell us how strong the trend is or how long it will last. Are we sure the signal is correct and will result in a gain? Of course not. No investment Model can be correct 100% of the time, but since it is a matter of probabilities we like the 80% winning trade odds we have accumulated so far. As usual the signal will remain active until the Model determines that the trend has changed, and since we never try to "second-guess" our Model, we will just have to wait and see. There will be plenty of pullbacks and corrections along the way; the key is to follow the strategy over the long-term, as our results clearly show.

If on the other hand you are still thorn and cannot stop questioning the current signal's validity, a quick re-read of the should do you a world of good.

Back to the Top of the page


FAQ of the Week
Question: How are Quadrants used in the Model?

The short answer is that Quadrants are in no way used as indicators in our Model and do not play any role in determining the market trend or the signals.

The Model primarily relies on price and volume action on the Nasdaq Composite Index. Unlike signals, quadrants or transitions between quadrants are in no way actionable in our plan. The four Quadrants have been introduced to help us understand and therefore cope better with the respective market psychologies. Please refer to our for more information on Trend Timing quadrants.

Now to the "So what Quadrant are we in right now and what does it mean to me?" question.

As luck would have it, after declaring the bear market and a Quadrant 3 Bear/Sell situation last week, the markets have conveniently decided to head the other way and rallied this week (handing us paper losses so far on this trade). Applying the EMA crossover rule to the letter would have us back in a bull market as of the close tonight. Clearly, this bull/bear indicator, just like most of technical analysis, is only an approximate science. Until the Nasdaq Composite's 10-day exponential moving average (EMA) decisively moves below the 200-day EMA and stays there, we are still in a transition zone between bull and bear, hovering between a Quadrant 2 and Quadrant 3. If a pronounced Quadrant 3 bear market develops, you will be the first to know.

Warm wishes and until next week.

The TimingCube Staff

Back to the Top of the page


Follow TimingCube » Follow TimingCube on Facebook Follow TimingCube on Twitter Follow TimingCube on LinkedIn

   Turbo Model
   Results
 
   Classic Model
  
   Site Map
   Glossary

TimingCube® is a registered trademark of Fraser Partners, LLC.
Disclaimer/Terms of Use    Privacy Policy
©2001- Fraser Partners, LLC
  All Rights Reserved.