|
| |
 |
|
Signal Update |
 |
Current
Signal Performance as of
Signal
Type |
Trade
Date |
Return
since issued |
|
|
|
World |
U.S. |
|
Nasdaq
100
(QQQQ)
|
Russell
2000
(IWM)
|
S&P
500
(SPY)
|
|

|
Market Update |
 |
Wall Street
continues on its winning streak with most major indexes posting
solid gains for the week. Stocks were significantly higher on
Monday with the S&P 500 finally being able to enter into positive
territory for the year. The market was fueled by several good
news, like a strong improvement in pending home sales, as well
as a bullish manufacturing report in China (as a reminder, China
- FXI is still ranked number one in our World ETF ranking).
Later on, a lot of speculation went on before the official publication
of the Obama administration's bank stress test on Friday. Rumors
peaked on Wednesday as the market was flooded with leaking information,
saying for instance that Bank of America will need another $34
billion in capital, CitiGroup between $5-$10 billion, and Wells
Fargo $15 billion. All this nervousness put a halt on the market
progression, causing all major U.S. indexes to retreat between
1% and 2.5% on Thursday. On Friday, the announcement that job
cuts for April fell to 530,000 compared to 633,000 in March
was viewed as a sign that the labor market is improving. There
was also a relative relief following the publication of the
government stress test results, as it appears that most banks
will not need government money to address their capital gaps.
The Nasdaq 100 (QQQQ) lost 0.41% on the week and is still above its 200-day exponential
moving average (EMA). On the other hand, the Russell 2000 (IWM)
and S&P 500 (SPY), posted
respective weekly gains of 4.49% and 5.79%. Both ETFs remain
located in-between their 50-day and 200-day EMAs.
For its part, our World portfolio posted a
5.76% gain this
week. The portfolio consists of the 5 top-ranked world ETFs
as of April 24, which marked the beginning of the current 4-week
holding period.
Our current Buy
signal remains in effect.

|
Trend Timing School |
 |
Ruler
and pencil as market timing tools
In this day and age, thanks in large part to widely accessible
computers, the levels of complexity and sophistication in many
fields has increased dramatically. This is certainly true in
the world of investing where vast amounts of information, analytical
tools and algorithms drive the large majority of trading by
hedge funds and institutional investors. The rules and algorithms
embodied in the TimingCube
trend timing model stem from technical analysis and are another
example of a mechanical, computer-aided investment strategy
made accessible to individual investors. While we certainly
depend and fully rely on our model's Buy/Cash/Sell
signals, as investors we enjoy and highly benefit from one of
the oldest and most widely used techniques in the book: trendlines.
Our long-time readers know that market movements, instead of
the seemingly random daily ups and downs, generally organize
themselves in trends, as does most everything in nature. There
are up trends, down trends and flat trends, and there are trends
of various durations. There are trends within trends. The long-term
primary or major trend is interspersed with shorter secondary
or intermediate trends. Active traders will look at minute or
hourly charts to spot short-term trends. Aggressive investors,
and we might place ourselves in that category, look at daily
or weekly charts to best identify secondary intermediate trends
lasting from a few weeks to a few months, which are also the
ones tracked by the TimingCube
model. Long-term investors will worry strictly about the major
predominant trends in order to stay invested most of the time
while maintaining solid protection against major bear markets.
The beauty of trendlines is their simplicity, and their visual
and intuitive nature. Sure, there have been many attempts to
turn trendline theories into complicated science, with numerous
treatise and books written about them, but by and large they
remain more of an art than an exact science. For our purposes,
there is fairly little required to trace major and intermediate
trends. The same approach and techniques apply to anything you
want to track, broad stock market indexes, individual stocks,
commodity prices, exchange rates, you name it. If you can plot
the price of something, you can draw trendlines with nothing
but a ruler and a pencil.
In their simplest form trendlines are straight lines drawn under
two rising intermediate price lows (bottom reversal points)
for an uptrend or over two decreasing intermediate highs (top
reversal points) for a down trend. The reason trendlines are
significant is that they tend to form zones of support or resistance,
respectively. To begin with the most effective and telling application
of trendlines to a macro view of the current market situation
we show in Chart 1 below which depicts the
Nasdaq Composite index since the start of the previous equity
bull market in 2002.
Chart 1: Major long-term trends can last for years

For long-term price charts we prefer to use a logarithmic scale
to straighten the trends. On a regular arithmetic scale, a long-term
bull market trend frequently looks like an ascending curve moving
away from a straight trend line. The log scale corrects that
optical illusion by making all vertical increments equal in
percentage terms. The chart above highlights nicely the two
main phases of the 2002-2007 bull market. The initial steep
ascending slope of the 1st year followed by a slower trending
channel which remained intact until it was decisively broken
to the downside by the new bear market in 2008.
In that wide view, with the help of a down trendline plotted
across the declining tops since the 2007 bull market high, it
is fairly clear that the prevailing major trend in effect today
remains the primary bear market. Despite the strong rally we
are experiencing since the March 2009 low, the market has a
way to go before it even approaches the main area of resistance,
which the down trendline represents. The market may well have
started a new bull market rise, meaning that it may eventually
reach and break through the downtrend, but do not expect it
to get there in one straight shot.
The one year view in Chart 2 below gives us
a better handle on the intermediate trends, but it also sheds
some light on the successive approximation nature of trend lines.
Most trendlines are re-drawn over and over again before they
settle into their final long-term slopes. Separate from the
primary downtrend seen in Chart 1, Chart
2 reveals a succession of intermediate down trendlines,
also called fan lines, which are typical of consolidation market
phases. Re-drawing of a new downtrend is required with every
intermediate reaction (bear market rally) during the major trend
(bear market). These reactions can take many forms such as triangles,
rectangles, or fan lines as presently. This process will continue
until either the primary trend resumes and the bear market goes
to set new lows, or a new bull market trend is established by
decisively braking through the previous primary downtrend (which
currently lies somewhere around 2100 on the Nasdaq Composite).
Chart 2: Intermediate trends last from a few weeks to
a few months

This is all you need to know about trendlines to get started.
Yes, with experience there is a lot more one can learn about
trendlines to become better at interpreting their more subtle
nuances. How strong is a trendline? What constitutes a valid
penetration of a trendline? And much more if you so desire.
The TimingCube
model does not make direct use of trendline techniques per se
but we like to use them from time to time to illustrate market
conditions. The visual perspective offered by trendline charts
is unique in allowing anyone with minimum training to identify
the trends that complement our investing strategy.

|
FAQ of the Week |
 |
Question:
What is the "Weekly Change" indicator in the World ETF Ranking
table?
The "Weekly Change" indicator is displayed
next to the "Rank" column purely as a convenience,
to provide a sense of direction, but most importantly so you
don't have to go manually compare with last week to know how
the positions changed. The up/down green/red arrows show the
direction since one week ago, and the number indicates how many
positions gained/lost in the ranking.
The Weekly Change information is interesting
to monitor, especially on the complete list, but it is not actionable.
The World ETF strategy is to invest in the
Top 5 ETFs and rebalance every 4 weeks, not to go after the
big movers. Some creative subscribers have attempted to read
more into the indicator than we intended and have invented and
tested (mostly to their great chagrin) any number of creative
strategies such as:
- Buy
the biggest movers (this usually yields the most volatile
ETFs which are just as likely to go down big as they went
up)
- Buy
the ETFs after they fall to the bottom of the rankings (but
you never know how long they can stay at the bottom and
how much more they can lose)
The bottom
line is that you should see the Weekly Change
simply as one more piece of information, not as a trading
signal.
Warm wishes and until next week.
The TimingCube
Staff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|