|
| |
 |
|
Signal Update
|
 |
Current
Signal Performance as of
Signal
Type |
Trade
Date |
Index |
Return
since issued |
|
|
|
Nasdaq 100 |
|
Russell 2000 |
|
S&P 500 |
|
Cumulative
Returns since First TimingCube
Live Signal () as of
Index |
Long
Only
|
Long
Only
with
Margin |
Long
& Short |
Long
& Short
with
Margin |
Buy
& Hold |
Nasdaq 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Russell 2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
S&P 500 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
Market Update |
 |
Markets
started the week by moving modestly lower on higher oil prices
and renewed fears that the Fed might have to keep hiking interest
rates for a while longer. These concerns were partly alleviated
as the week wore on, and as optimism returned following better-than-expected
earnings reports, major indices regained their footing and moved
solidly higher. Both the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P
500 finished the week at new 6-year highs, while the Russell
2000
closed at an all-time high. Friday's release of a weaker-than-expected
April jobs report bolstered hopes that the Fed will soon stop
its tightening campaign. The resulting bond rally, coupled with
lower oil prices, helped stocks close the week on a strong note.
The Nasdaq 100 and S&P 500 respectively gained 0.77% and
1.16% over the 5-day span. Both were outperformed by the Russell
2000, which finished the week 2.26% higher. All three indices
still rest above both their respective 50-day and 200-day exponential
moving averages (EMAs). There is no change as far as our Model
is concerned and our Buy
signal remains active.

|
Trend Timing School |
 |
Market
divergence
Most of the time broad market indices are well correlated and
move in harmony, with differences being in their relative strengths.
At other times they can become disconnected and move in seemingly
opposite directions. Right now, depending on which investor
you speak with, they may be ecstatic with the recent performance
of the stock market (they probably invest in the Russell 2000
or international indices which are all making new highs), or
they could be close to despair (possibly because they are invested
in the Nasdaq 100
which has been coming down since its January high, which wasn't
all that high to begin with). Talk about a schizophrenic market.
This is called a market divergence, and it is happening both
in a long and a short time scale.
Let us take the long view first. Chart 1 below
compares the Nasdaq 100 index with the Russell 2000 over the
last 7 years. Today, the Nasdaq finds itself about 64% below
the all-time high it achieved in March of 2000, bringing many
Nasdaq followers to declare the beginning of a secular bear
market. Indeed, even considering the nice gains since the October
2002 lows, it is plain to see that it will take quite a few
years more to recoup the losses (but that is the curse of buy
and hold). Since the beginning of 2003, using a Long
and Short strategy, the Nasdaq 100 has gained about
50%, but in contrast, the Russell 2000 increased by 135%. The
Russell 2000 erased the effects of the 2000-2002 bear market
long ago and has been setting new all-time highs ever since.
No sign of a bear market on that chart, secular or not.
Chart 1: Contrasting fortunes between the Nasdaq 100
and Russell 2000
The reason such divergences occur is that broad market indices
are not identically broad, but differ in number of companies,
market capitalization, industry mix, etc. At times these differences
can become acute as was the case during the technology bubble.
Yes, all markets were in one of the longest bull markets that
culminated in early 2000, but the Nasdaq 100 and to a somewhat
lesser degree the Nasdaq Composite
are heavily dominated by technology giants like Microsoft, Apple,
Intel, and Cisco. These were the high flyers which got bid up
to such artificially insane multiples that the descent had to
be much steeper than for the average stock. Even since the October
2002 bottom these erstwhile leaders have been mostly out of
favor, and they got outpaced by most other stock groups.
Short-term examination paints a similar picture. The broad markets
have been in a solid bull run and many indices have been making
new highs, like the Russell 2000 and the Dow Jones Transportation Average. Those that have not yet made new all-time highs
are within striking distance. Even the Wilshire 5000 which
represents the entire market is close to a new high. Then there
is the Nasdaq. As can be seen in Chart 2 below,
the Nasdaq 100 has been going against the grain by coming down
since its January high. And its chart looks sickly. In an attempt
to find the root cause for this under-performance we took a
look at the Nasdaq 100 Equal Weighted index in which each stock
accounts for 1/100th of the index, unlike the regular Nasdaq
100 which is market-cap weighted, meaning that the mammoths
like Microsoft dominate. The largest 10 companies account for
over 40% of the index. These stocks have been falling out of
favor and the equal weighted index shows that without their
overwhelming influence, the rest of the companies in the index
have been moving with the broad market, i.e. up.
Chart 2: Nasdaq 100 versus Nasdaq 100 equal weighted

Most of us see the Nasdaq 100 divergence as a cyclical rotation
out of the large tech stock sector, but others point to the
Dow Jones Utilities index, which has dropped over 7% since its
October 2005 high, as a bad omen for the rest of the market.
As always, Trend Timers do not predict when the bull market
will run its course, rather we let the market tell us. And in the meantime, for those of us who are still mostly or even exclusively invested in the QQQQ, despite our countless admonitions, it is high time to diversify. In addition to
the Russell 2000 and international funds, you now also have
the Nasdaq 100 equal weighted ETF to consider (see "FAQ
of the Week" below).

|
FAQ of the Week |
 |
Question:
Has the Nasdaq 100 equal weighted ETF started trading?
Yes. As promised, here is our notification that the Nasdaq 100
Equal Weighted index fund has just started trading under the
ticker symbol QQEW. In the equal weighted fund, each company
represents 1/100th of the index, unlike the regular Nasdaq 100
which is market-cap weighted towards the large tech stocks such
as Microsoft, Apple, Intel and Cisco.
For more information about QQEW, read "What
is your take on the new Nasdaq equal-weighted ETF?".
For more information about why an equal weighted investment
may be better suited for current market conditions, read "Market
divergence" above.
Warm
wishes and until next week.
The TimingCube
Staff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|