Current
Signal Performance as of
Signal
Type |
Trade
Date |
Index |
Return
since issued |
|
|
|
Nasdaq 100 |
|
Russell 2000 |
|
S&P 500 |
|

Continuing to show strength, all major indexes moved higher again over
the 5 day-span, albeit more modestly than during the previous week.
After a rather uneventful Monday in which stocks posted small gains on
low volume, the main averages retreated Tuesday following a
disappointing outlook from Texas Instruments and cautious comments from
blue chip companies McDonald's and DuPont. Record oil prices just below
$120 a barrel also did not help. The weakness did not last as positive
earnings news from Broadcom helped push tech stocks higher Wednesday,
the Nasdaq composite gaining 1.2% during the session on brisk volume.
Stocks proved to be resilient Thursday: after a lower open following
weak earnings forecasts from Apple, Amazon.com and Starbucks, the market
turned around to post solid gains on the day as volume increased for the
second straight session. With Microsoft issuing an underwhelming
earnings outlook after the close, stocks dropped Friday morning. A weak
reading on consumer confidence also weighed on investor sentiment. By
mid-day, however, the major averages started to recover and if the
Nasdaq Composite still finished with a marginal loss for the day, the
S&P 500 posted a 0.65% gain.
For the week, the Nasdaq 100 gained 0.96%. The index is still located
above both its 50-day and 200-day Exponential Moving Averages (EMAs).
The S&P 500 and Russell 2000 respectively gained 0.54% and 0.11% over
the 5-day span and both indexes are situated in-between their 50-day and
200-day EMAs.
For its part, our World Index Ranking portfolio
outperformed its U.S. counterparts this week with a gain of
2.24%. The portfolio
consists of the 5 top-ranked world indexes as of March 28, which
marked the beginning of the current 4-week holding period. The
World Index Ranking portfolio is being rebalanced
today, as the current 4-week holding period is now over.
Our current Buy
signal remains in effect.

Money
to dedicate to the stock market
The very subject of money is very delicate and personal, sometimes
even taboo. Many people do not want to discuss it. We fully
support discretion and privacy aspects of money but for once,
since we are amongst friends sharing similar wealth building
ambitions, we will make an exception and address the age old
question of "How much money should I invest in the stock
market?" head-on.
Money being one of the two primary ingredients of the Trend
Timing wealth building system (the other one being time itself),
we feel it is an appropriate topic for this editorial. While
how much money to invest is a highly personal question, and
we recognize that not one size fits all, we always reply without
hesitation "Substantially all your serious money".
We are not Financial Advisors but from experience we can clearly
state that any meaningful wealth building system begins with
the identification and long term commitment of funds, what we
call serious money.
- We
have been taught that all money is serious, so what is serious
money?
Any money that you do not need to live or as working capital
in the near term should be viewed as serious money that
you set aside and put to work entirely for your wealth building
system.
- When?
The sooner the better.
You don't
withdraw serious money to pay bills, or to buy this summer's
vacation. You don't use serious money to speculate or gamble
on risky, get rich quick schemes. Serious money is your long
term savings and retirement plan. What is long term? For all
practical purposes, it is the rest of your life.
Now that we have defined what serious money is, how prudent
is it to recommend that all of it should be invested in the
stock market according to the Trend Timing Model?
We have always been firm advocates of diversification, and
we recognized the wisdom of asset and strategy diversification
as good risk management disciplines in several of our editorials.
Our stock portfolio will be diversified by definition because
we advocate investing exclusively in market index instruments
which represent broad baskets of companies and industries.
If you are willing to add assets diversification to your investments,
you may want to consider the ETFTide
system which encompasses not only broad world equity markets
but also ETFs investing in specific industry segments as well
as non-stock asset classes such as bonds, commodities, currencies
and real estate.
Because a Buy and Hold approach to investing guarantees riding
every correction and bear market to the bottom, conventional
wisdom has complemented this strategy with portfolio diversification
to limit exposure to such stock market declines. As such,
you would allocate only a fraction of your serious money to
equities, and the balance would be placed in non-correlated
investments or income producing instruments. We have always
rejected such performance crippling wisdom. In fact, the most
prominent difference between Buy and Hold and Trend Timing
is precisely the "all-weather" characteristic of staying on
the right side of the market and therefore benefiting from
both rising and declining markets. This is why we are eager
to put ALL of our serious money to work in
the stock market ALL of the time. The more
the better. The only exception would be in the case of a Cash
signal.
We appreciate the level of confidence, trust, and courage
involved in the decision to commit serious money to an investment
system. It does not have to be Trend Timing. As long as you
select a time proven, all-weather investment method that meets
your risk/reward tolerance, and that you can emotionally stick
with for the long term, we know that you will be better off
than if you hesitate on the sidelines. Money left sitting
in cash or money market funds is not bearing any fruits, and
is in fact steadily losing value due to inflation. Even if
you decide to test the waters by committing only a fraction
of your serious money, the consequence is watered down results.
We urge the uncommitted and partially committed to learn to
trust a system soon because one thing is for certain, without
a system and without long term consistency there can be no
meaningful wealth building.

Question:
Can I use leverage with your service?
The short answer to this question is certainly yes, but could
also be "it depends"! It depends on the strategy,
for example we would not recommend using leverage with the World
Index ranking because its top performers tend to be
very volatile. This volatility can induce large drawdowns from
time to time and not everyone could handle amplifying the bumpy
ride further with leverage.
For strategies
investing in US domestic indexes, choosing the amount of leverage
to apply is one of the few decisions we need to make. The
answer to the question "How much is too much?" is of course
highly personal and varies greatly based on our individual
risk tolerance. The point at which greed meets with fear is
different for all of us.
One thing we can state categorically is that we consider it
folly to buy fully leveraged investments on margin. Specifically,
what some extremely brave and/or foolhardy investors do is
to buy the 2x bull/bear index ETFs or mutual funds from the
likes of ProFunds and Rydex on full margin, for a resulting
leverage of 4 to 1. While they could laugh all the way to
the bank if the market fully cooperates, there are possible
worst-case scenarios that you need to consider first. Let's
say we experience a 15% drawdown which triggers a Cash
signal, by the time we liquidate an unleveraged position the
next day we could be down more or less than the 15% signal
trigger (never forget that markets have been known to move
by over 20% in a single day), but with the 4x leverage you
would lose 60% or more of your capital in one fell swoop.
And it takes a 150% gain to breakeven from a 60% loss!
We are all in favor of a conservative use of margin. We believe
most investors cannot tolerate the wild ride of full leverage
(100%) during volatile times. Instead, we commonly advocate
an 80/20 blend of non-leveraged/leveraged investments.
Warm wishes and until next week.
The TimingCube
Staff
|
|