|
Signal Update
|
 |
Current
Signal Performance as of
Signal
Type |
Trade
Date |
Return
since issued |
|
|
|
World |
U.S. |
|
Nasdaq
100
(QQQQ)
|
Russell
2000
(IWM)
|
S&P
500
(SPY)
|
|

|
Market Update |
 |
After three
consecutive weeks of selling, stocks rebounded strongly over
the five-day span, despite another drop on Monday. The main
indexes initially rose during the week's first session but eventually
turned lower, causing the Nasdaq Composite to drop another 2
percent, therefore continuing the negative trend of late. The
picture completely changed Tuesday, after Citigroup said that
it was profitable the first two months of the year. The news
triggered a huge rebound for the battered financial sector,
which in turn sent all the major averages soaring on heavy volume.
The S&P 500 vaulted 6.4% on the day, marking its biggest gain
since late November. After a quiet session Wednesday, during
which stocks managed to retain the previous day's gains, the
main indexes posted another strong advance Thursday after Bank
of America also announced that it made money during the first
two months of 2009. The resulting rally in financials spilled
over to the rest of the market, helping the S&P 500 gain another
4.1%. Stocks showed resolve Friday as they managed to climb
for the fourth consecutive session despite initial profit taking
attempts. Please note that with this week's strong showing,
the major averages are now back above their 2008 lows.
The Nasdaq 100 (QQQQ), S&P 500 (SPY) and Russell 2000 (IWM)
respectively gained 9.28%, 10.40% and 11.85% on the week. All
3 ETFs remain located below both their 50-day and 200-day exponential
moving averages (EMAs).
For its part, our World portfolio posted a
4.71% gain this
week. The portfolio consists of the 5 top-ranked world ETFs
as of February 27, which marked the beginning of the current
4-week holding period. Please note that since we now have an
active Cash signal,
the World approach calls for selling your holdings
if you follow the "Long Only" or "Long
and Short" strategy. Only if you follow the "Buy
and Rebalance" strategy should you remain invested
in the top 5 ETFs, as the strategy calls for staying invested
at all times. Please go to the "Our
Service" page for all the details.
It is too early to tell whether or not the rally will last,
as part of this week's action was the result of short covering.
In the meantime, our current Cash
signal remains in effect.

|
Trend Timing School |
 |
Looking
for relief
The stock market has been downright woeful for weeks, months
it seems, well over a year in fact, and the downward momentum
has done nothing but accelerate. Except for this week of course,
but one week in row does not make a trend. Stock investors are
desperate for relief, the ones still holding on for dear life
to their ruined long positions anyway. Even we, the lucky ones
who are sitting in the safety of cash, are running out of patience
and want an opportunity to make some money, or make some of
the money back as the case may be. A good old relief rally is
what everyone wants right now and, conveniently if not very
reliably, there is no dearth of pundits out there to proclaim
that it has arrived. The sad truth is that most of them have
been calling a bottom repeatedly for months and have lost vast
sums of money for their trusting followers. Cash may be boring,
but it beats the recurring whipsaws inflicted by many timing
gurus.
We need to remember that since the year 2000 we have been in
a secular bear market and that since the fall of 2007, and until
proven otherwise, we are in the worst cyclical bear market in
a century. With such a combination the odds do not favor bold
bullish moves. The reason many call bottom picking a sucker's
game is that when finally a bear market rally (aka sucker's
rally) does take place it tends to be short lived.
Instead of attempting to decide what the market should be doing
we always prefer looking at what the market actually does. We
plotted the depths reached by the bear market as seen through
the Dow Jones Industrial Average, in red in Chart 1
below. Because some people can better visualize ballistic trajectories
as moon shots, going up, we have added DXD in green, the UltraShort
Dow 30 ProShares ETF which strives to achieve twice the inverse
performance of the Dow. A runaway curve if we ever saw one.
Chart 1: Ballistic markets and overbought/oversold indicators

The red and green arrows are rapidly and asymptotically approaching
the vertical. Knowing that no market ever goes straight up or
straight down makes us hopeful for a rebound rally of some sort
sooner rather than later, but popular wisdom warns against trying
to catch a falling knife. Still, the world is unlikely to end
and the stock market is unlikely to go to zero in the next few
weeks.
We are not trying to pick a bottom but by sheer accident, by
writing this, we might be just as prophetic as we were when
we last wrote about not trying to pick market bottoms (in our
July 28, 2006 Weekly Update), within days of an important intermediate
bottom from which the Nasdaq Composite rallied over 35%.
We will also not repeat here the argument some are making in
the financial press about markets being undervalued at these
beaten down levels because we all know that fundamentals make
for poor timing indicators. We are more intrigued by the technicians
who look at mechanical indicators such as overbought/oversold
market conditions in the market. Technical analysis has developed
an array of oscillators to spot extreme situations which could
signal key turning points. The most popular are the so-called
banded-oscillators which fluctuate between two extremes, typically
0 and 100, and have defined bands indicating overbought and
oversold conditions. Two such indicators are the Relative Strength
Index (RSI) and the Stochastic Oscillator. With RSI, anything
above 70 is overbought, and anything below 30 is oversold. For
the Stochastics the bands are usually set at 80 and 20.
Referring to Chart 1 again, we see the RSI
and Stochastics drawn under the Dow price graph. Since about
mid-February, when the Dow Jones Industrial dropped below the
7,000 mark, the two indicators have dipped into their respective
oversold ranges which many will interpret as buy signals. Trouble
is that the same oversold levels and buy signals were reached
in October 2008 when the Dow still traded above 8,500, and in
June/July 2008 with the Dow above 11,000, to mention just the
most recent instances.
We are not saying this is not a bottom, or the bottom, because
it could well be. We don't know yet and neither does anyone
else. We are after intermediate trend changes, not bottoms leading
to more bottoms.
For us Trend Timers relief simply means getting a tradable signal,
any signal to get us back on our wealth-building track. Certainly,
we could use a strong bear market rally that our model picks
up with a highly profitable Buy
signal, but we are not going to wish it so hard as to predict
it. A market bottom can never be recognized at the lowest point,
because a bottom is defined by the rebound that follows. As
soon as our model detects that a new trend has actually been
established, a signal will be issued. Until then we remain patient
and safe.

|
FAQ of the Week |
 |
Question:
What of applying TimingCube
signals to TradeGuru
stocks?
After reading last week's Trend Timing School article in which
we highlight our sister service TradeGuru
as a good example of a strategy purely driven by fundamental
analysis, a number of subscribers came to wonder if overlaying
the TimingCube
signals could not benefit that stock picking strategy.
Unlike TimingCube,
TradeGuru
is designed to stay fully invested in stocks at all times. The
strategy works well in most markets, even sometimes during bear
markets as it did during 2002 when TradeGuru
portfolios beat the market with great returns (+23%
and +58% versus
-25% for the S&P
500). Even though timing TradeGuru
with TimingCube
signals would have worked well during the second half of last
year, there are others times when it substantially reduces performance,
as is the case during explosive rallies off intermediate market
bottoms.
We view the two strategies as being so different that they are
truly complementary to each other. Because of this we like to
keep the two services separate and manage risk through strategy
diversification, i.e. they are better separate than combined.
Warm wishes and until next week.
The TimingCube
Staff
|
|
|