Current
Signal Performance as of
Signal
Type |
Trade
Date |
Index |
Return
since issued |
|
|
|
Nasdaq 100 |
|
Russell 2000 |
|
S&P 500 |
|
Cumulative
Returns since First TimingCube
Live Signal () as of
Index |
Long
Only
|
Long
Only
with
Margin |
Long
& Short |
Long
& Short
with
Margin |
Buy
& Hold |
Nasdaq 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Russell 2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
S&P 500 |
|
|
|
|
|

Stocks retreated
this week as fears of inflation and more interest rate hikes
resurfaced yet again, driving bond yields higher. Most of the
damage was inflicted on the Nasdaq 100, as investors aggressively
sold former leading stocks such as Google which has now retreated
almost 30% from the all-time high it hit on January 12. As money
rotated into more conservative sectors, blue-chip indices such
as the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average fared
much better, with the Dow even posting a gain on the week. Bucking
the negative tone of trading that prevailed the first four days
of the week, stocks rebounded on Friday after the February jobs
report calmed fears of an overheating economy, with the unemployment
rate edging slightly higher to 4.8%.
The Nasdaq 100 and Russell 2000 respectively lost 2.14% and
1.64% on the week. The S&P 500 did better with only a 0.44
loss. The Russell 2000 and S&P 500 remain above both their
50 and 200-day exponential moving averages (EMAs) while the
Nasdaq 100 now sits between its two EMAs. There is no change
for us and our Buy
signal remains in effect.

Leveraged
bull/bear mutual funds explained
This category of mutual funds has been largely misunderstood
by individual investors ever since the 1994 introduction of
the first bear fund - Rydex Ursa. Through the long bull
market of the nineties most investors got used to the bear funds
being the perennial dogs at the bottom of the performance rankings,
unaware that they were short funds lost in a sea of unrelated
long funds. Not until the bubble burst in 2000 did investors
begin to realize that maybe there was a valuable role for these
funds after all. Since these early days the size and importance
of the bull/bear index mutual funds segment has increased dramatically
with addition of leverage and more index choices providing financial
professionals and sophisticated investors with tools to better
manage portfolios in all market environments. They are key investment
vehicles for Trend Timers like us.
The fund industry has grown and evolved to the point where we
now have multiple fund families, namely ProFunds and Rydex,
offering full complements of bull and bear funds, unleveraged
and leveraged, for all the key U.S. indices we track. The "Resources"
page holds a complete list of the funds available (Investing
with index mutual funds) and details on how to implement
the four TimingCube
strategies with them (Implementing
the strategies). For example, how do you go short the Russell
2000, with leverage in one simple transaction you may ask? Easy,
you buy the ProFunds UltraShort Small-Cap 100 Fund which
seeks to return 200% the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index.
When the Russell 2000 goes down 1%, the fund gains 2%.
Newer index ETFs are all the rage, but when it comes to practical
investment choices, for many Trend Timers the bull/bear mutual
funds are the only real alternatives. Specifically, restriction
on qualified retirement plans such as IRAs precludes the use
of short selling and trading on margin, which leaves the Long
Only strategy as the only possible choice for an ETF investor.
Sure, some brokerage firms allow certain types of options trading
in retirement accounts, but options trading techniques can be
daunting for many of us. In fact, the simplicity of investing
with the mutual funds is such (after all, what could be easier
than to exchange this fund for that fund, in one transaction,
with no transaction fees?) that many Trend Timers favor them
even for non-retirement accounts. The February 06, 2004 FAQ
of the Week entitled "Am I better off using ETFs
or mutual funds?" summarizes the pros and cons of these
funds.
So how do they do it? Unlike index ETFs which invest precisely
in the stock of companies that make up their benchmark index,
bull/bear index mutual funds may actually have no exposure to
these securities at all. The fund manager has vast latitude
as to which securities or financial instruments are used in
pursuit of the funds investment objective which, for the most
part, means that they use derivatives. A derivative is simply
a contract between two or more parties, and its price is determined
by the fluctuations of an underlying asset (the price is said
to be "derived" from that underlying asset). Assets on which
contracts are written include stocks, commodities, currencies,
interest rates and stock market indices. A key characteristic
of derivatives is that they are heavily leveraged, which means
that you can effectively control quantities of the underlying
asset for a small fraction of the price of the asset itself.
The types of derivatives used include future contracts, options
on future contracts, options on securities and indices, forward
contracts, swap agreements and other similar instruments.
As always with investments, nothing is perfect. There are clearly
risks associated with such instruments, including an aggressive
investment technique risk, correlation risk and others. By far
the most significant one in our view is the leverage risk. Any
time you invest with leverage, be it with these funds or through
the use of margin or options, you multiply your potential gains
as well as losses. We also pointed out in the December 10 and
17, 2004 articles "A short-term review of bull/bear
mutual funds" and "More on ETFs versus bull/bear
mutual funds" that under certain circumstances the leveraged
funds do not accurately track their index due to the negative
compounding effect. Still, all-in-all, the convenience and flexibility
they offer makes them an irreplaceable tool for Trend Timers.

Question:
How can I find the performance of a particular index or fund?
Selecting which investment vehicles you use to implement the
TimingCube
strategies usually involves an analysis of how well correlated
they are with the broad market trends and our signals. Whether
you are looking at ETFs, indices, individual stocks or mutual
funds, it is important to check how well they would have performed
if traded with the TimingCube
signal. Short of going deep into statistical analysis and calculating
correlation ratios, we offer an easy tool to assess individual
securities on the "Results" page.
Simply enter a ticker symbol in the "Performance by
individual security or index" section and a window
will open with lots of performance data. For example, you could
go to the "Trades and Cumulative Returns" section
to get the total return for a time period of your choice (by
selecting a start date from the pull-down menu). The absolute
return is important when comparing various securities, but just
as important is how well correlated it is with the signal. The
best way to tell good correlation is when the "Long
& Short" return is substantially better than the "Buy
& Hold" return. The 2005
ETF Performance rankings we published in the January 6,
2006 issue of the Trend Timing School gives you a good example
of data we developed directly from the "Performance
by individual security or index" tool. It also provides
a broad list of ETFs you might want to look into. By running
these ETFs through the ticker tool again we were able to quickly
tell that so far in 2006 the Brazil fund continues to
lead with a gain of over 13%, followed closely by the China
fund (FXI) at around 12%.
The "Performance by Bull/Bear mutual funds"
section further down on the "Results" page is
dedicated to the ProFunds and Rydex mutual fund families and
helps you check specific bull/bear fund pairs.
Warm
wishes and until next week.
The TimingCube
Staff
|
|