Current
Signal Performance as of
Signal
Type |
Trade
Date |
Index |
Return
since issued |
|
|
|
Nasdaq 100 |
|
Russell 2000 |
|
S&P 500 |
|
Cumulative
Returns since First TimingCube
Live Signal () as of
Index |
Long
Only
|
Long
Only
with
Margin |
Long
& Short |
Long
& Short
with
Margin |
Buy
& Hold |
Nasdaq 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Russell 2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
S&P 500 |
|
|
|
|
|

It has been a quiet holiday-shortened week, generally marked by low trading volume. A decline in tech stocks pushed prices lower Tuesday, only to see the markets rebound Wednesday to erase their losses. With earnings season now over, investors are focusing on geopolitical and economic news. As oil prices bounced up and down all week, so did the markets. Stock prices were also affected by inflation concerns that seem to resurface every other day, even though rate-hike fears were first soothed Wednesday after the latest CPI report showed that core inflation for January was only 0.2%. The net result of all this conflicting news is that major indices did not move much this week, with the Nasdaq 100 and S&P 500 only recording fractional gains. Our best-performing index, the Russell 2000, was the exception as it gained 0.76% to close the week at a new all-time high. Of the three indices, the Nasdaq 100 is the only one which still rests below its 50-day exponential moving average (EMA), if just by a fraction. All three are still well above their respective long-term 200-day EMAs.
Our Model did not indicate any change in the broad market trend
and our current Buy
signal consequently remains active.

Trends
within trends
One of the most abused and overused technical analysis clichés
is that "the stock market moves in trends". The
statement is certainly true, but there are so many different
trends that the truism is meaningless. One can look at trends
in individual stocks, in specific company groups or industry
segments, or in the broad market indices. Even more bewildering
is the endless range of possible observation periods which yields
trends galore. Some traders chase trends that come and go in
the space of an hour or in a single day by looking at extremely
short-term minute charts. Others stretch it to hourly or to
the more common daily charts. As Trend Timers we favor longer
term intermediate trends with signals that last on average between
3 and 5 months. This article explains some of the reasons why
we prefer the long view. When it comes to picking a trend we certainly
do not mean to imply that we have the one and only answer .
It is true that active traders can make money playing short
moves of a few hours, days, to a few weeks. It is also true
that it is a hard way to make a living, with lots of trading
and narrow win/loss ratios. We much prefer our infrequent trading.
Looking at the short 2-month price evolution of the Nasdaq Composite
index
in Chart 1 below we clearly observe a downtrend that
began mid-January. Nice declining tops and lows. Many investors
get antsy holding a long position during this kind of decline
(especially those that are tightly focusing on the Nasdaq) and
they wish they could play the short term swings. The challenge
for rapid traders is when to call the trades and still manage
to make money. Despite the fact that there are always lots of
top callers out there, no one can consistently and reliably
do so. For momentum to reverse it takes some amount of decline
and it takes at least two successive tops or bottoms to draw
the simplest trend line. But even if you picked the entire move
from the very top on January 11, 2006 to the bottom on February
13th, that would represent 54 points or less than 2.5%. Not
much to write home about.
Chart 1: Nasdaq Composite index in 1-1/2 month downtrend

Another major drawback of short term trends, in our view, is
their specificity. Observed in periods of days or even a few
weeks, markets show little correlation with one another, and
it takes one dedicated trend detection system/signal for each.
This point is made rather clear when you contrast the Nasdaq
Composite above with the Dow Jones Transportation Average in Chart
2 below. It turns out that many indices, domestic and international,
look more like the Transports and have been setting new highs.
As we have observed for some time, the Nasdaq has been lagging.
Chart 2: Dow Jones Transportation index in 1-1/2 month
uptrend

Reverting to the Nasdaq Composite index, we now take the longer
view in Chart 3 below. As if by magic the recent
decline almost disappears and what becomes clear is the solid
uptrend since mid-October 2005. Earlier this month the index
pulled back to test and bounce off the 5 month-old trend line.
Unlike the 2 month-chart, the same 6-month chart of the Composite
looks very well correlated with most indices, and while all
have gained following the uptrend since our October 20, 2005
signal, many have done a lot better than the Nasdaq.
Chart 3: Nasdaq Composite index in 5 month uptrend

We don’t know how long the current intermediate uptrend
will last, but as long as our Model points the way up we will
not worry about short term pullbacks.

Question:
Does your Model react to events such as terrorist attacks?
News events play no direct role in our Model. However, events
with large enough impact and lasting consequences can have an
impact on investor outlook and in turn on the stock market.
Since our Model derives the predominant mid-term trend from
observing the market, it could be indirectly impacted by events
large enough to move the market trend.
A massive event like the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack
exemplified the fact that such point events can induce short
term crashes, but that markets tend to recover their losses
promptly. How deep and long lasting the impact of an event on
the stock market is depends primarily on its reach and how permanent
the damage is. As we have seen with hurricane Katrina, large
scale natural disasters have the potential to inflict such damage,
and terrorist attacks such as today's foiled attack on Saudi
oil facilities could as well if successful and repeated.
Warm
wishes and until next week.
The TimingCube
Staff
|
|