Follow TimingCube » Follow TimingCube on Facebook Follow TimingCube on Twitter Follow TimingCube on LinkedIn
Turbo Model




Signal Update
Current Signal Performance as of
Signal Type
Trade Date
Index
Return since issued
Nasdaq 100
Russell 2000
S&P 500
QQQQ

Cumulative Returns since First TimingCube Live Signal () as of
Index
Long Only
Long Only
with
Margin
Long & Short
Long & Short
with
Margin
Buy & Hold
Nasdaq 100
Russell 2000
S&P 500
QQQQ

Note: QQQQ returns are included for continuity sake.

Back to the Top of the page


Market Update
Major indices finished the week on a weaker note than they started it, but market action was pretty tame overall. Both the Dow and the S&P 500 are still within striking distance of their December highs, and together with the Russell 2000, they rest above their 50-day exponential moving average (EMA). The Nasdaq 100 is still trailing, as has been the case since the beginning of the year. Earnings season is now mostly behind us and despite a few high-profile misses from the likes of eBay or Cisco, reported results have been solid overall. On the economic front, the Producer Price Index (PPI) came in higher than expected on Friday. Not surprisingly, this caused bonds to suffer but stocks did OK, with the Dow even gaining 31 points on the day.

For the week, the S&P 500 posted a mild loss of 0.31%. The Russell 2000 and Nasdaq 100 experienced slightly bigger losses of 0.73% and 0.99%, respectively. The week's action had no impact on our Model and our Buy signal remains in effect.

Back to the Top of the page


Trend Timing School
Volatility as a market trend indicator

On Wednesday of this week, February 16, 2005, market volatility as measured by the Chicago Board Options Exchange volatility index, also known as VIX, has reached a low (11.10) not seen since 1995. Going by what is said and written in the media and in the investment advisory community one might easily jump to the conclusion that from here the markets must be headed lower. We don't know what markets will do in the future but we do know, as we will endeavor to demonstrate in this article, that a low volatility level has never been a reliable indicator of market tops.

Volatility is a measure of changes in price expressed in percentage terms, without regard to direction. It is frequently used as a market risk indicator. Since future volatility (and the related price changes) is only known when it has become historic volatility, benchmarks have been created which use the prices of stock index options as a way to estimate expected future volatility. Introduced in 1993, the VIX has been considered by many to be the world's premier barometer of investor sentiment and market volatility. With a major facelift in 2003, by changing the way it is calculated and switching to options on the S&P 500 instead of those on the S&P 100, and by offering the first-ever trading in VIX futures during 2004, VIX has become ever more popular.

The erroneous popular wisdom of equating low VIX readings with a bearish sign stems from the following logic. High or rising volatility corresponds to an increasing sense of risk which culminates in the extreme fear typically seen at market bottoms, and in perfect contrarian fashion a low or decreasing volatility supposedly reveals investors being too complacent as is usually the case at market tops.

As usual a picture is worth a thousand words, and to that effect we present a chart showing the VIX from 1990 to the present day, overlaid on the Nasdaq Composite Index as a reflection of market price movements.

The first deduction we can make from the chart is that absolute volatility readings have no bearing on market trend. Markets have risen during times of low volatility (e.g. 1995), as they have with high VIX readings (e.g. 1999), and the same can be said of declining markets. As one would expect, the higher the volatility, the larger the distance between price highs and lows, which is what volatility is all about. For example, the lowest VIX reading of the fifteen year period happened during 1993 (9.31) which saw an 18% price swing between the high and the low. On the other extreme, the VIX high occurred during 1998 (45.74) when prices fluctuated by 35%. Yet, both 1993 and 1999 turned out to be up years.

So instead of absolute VIX readings it must be relative VIX values, or changes in volatility which show the way, right? Wrong. What about the ratio of the index and the VIX (e.g. S&P 500 divided by VIX) which some advisors claim to be the magic formula? Nope. In fact, Mark Hulbert, the well respected publisher of the Hulbert Financial Digest, has done extensive analysis on this subject and in recent articles he concludes that there simply is no historical support for the notion that a low VIX indicates that a market top is near, and that while high VIX readings often have come before market rallies, the same also appears to be true for low VIX readings.

What the chart above reveals however, is that large upward VIX spikes consistently coincide with market lows as can be seen repeatedly, including the one that resulted from the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. A well known behavior of markets is that declines are generally much more explosive than increases. Markets can drop further over a shorter period of time than they rise, as exemplified by the "Black Monday" on October 19, 1987 when the Dow Jones Industrials dropped by a whopping 22.6%. This primarily has to do with human self-preservation psychology in which fear and panic are much stronger emotions than enthusiasm and excitement. Even during manias driving market bubbles skyward, volatility does not come close to the spikes seen during bear market declines and crashes. As a matter of fact, the chart reveals that there are no downward volatility spikes.

As Trend Timers we have profited in times of both high and low volatility. Significant bear markets and crashes coinciding with volatility spikes are good for market timers because, by definition, it is during Sell signals that we have an opportunity to substantially gain on Buy and Hold approaches. Just because we enjoy such periods of extreme volatility does not mean we can use the VIX index as a reliable market trend predictor. For that, we will continue using the market itself and follow the trends it exhibits.

Back to the Top of the page


FAQ of the Week
Question: Have the Nasdaq 100 and QQQQ lost their leading ways?

Many subscribers having noticed that the Nasdaq 100 and related investment vehicles have been trailing the Russell 2000, and even the S&P 500, ask if they might have permanently lost their winning streak. As usual, some pundits are predicting a new era, a fundamental and enduring paradigm shift favoring other sectors of the market. Such prophecies frequently coincide with the arrival of the next market rotation. We are believers in repeating market cycles and, just as they have in the past, market rotations will continue in the future.

Since we do not predict which segment of the market is likely to become the next leader, we favor diversification between different domestic and international indices. You can read more about this topic in the Weekly Updates of January 23, 2004, March 19, 2004, and November 12, 2004.

Warm wishes and until next week.

The TimingCube Staff

Back to the Top of the page


Follow TimingCube » Follow TimingCube on Facebook Follow TimingCube on Twitter Follow TimingCube on LinkedIn

   Turbo Model
   Results
 
   Classic Model
  
   Site Map
   Glossary

TimingCube® is a registered trademark of Fraser Partners, LLC.
Disclaimer/Terms of Use    Privacy Policy
©2001- Fraser Partners, LLC
  All Rights Reserved.