Follow TimingCube » Follow TimingCube on Facebook Follow TimingCube on Twitter Follow TimingCube on LinkedIn
Turbo Model




Signal Update
Current Signal Performance as of
Signal Type
Trade Date
Index
Return since issued
Nasdaq 100
Russell 2000
S&P 500
QQQQ

Cumulative Returns since First TimingCube Live Signal () as of
Index
Long Only
Long Only
with
Margin
Long & Short
Long & Short
with
Margin
Buy & Hold
Nasdaq 100
Russell 2000
S&P 500
QQQQ

Note: QQQQ returns are included for continuity sake.

Back to the Top of the page


Market Update
Since our last update right before the holidays, the markets had two radically different weeks. The shortened holiday week was expected to be the traditional low volume Santa Claus rally, but instead it delivered the worst single week performance in months. That week the yield curve inverted (see FAQ of the Week below) for the first time since 2000 and many, fearing this was a signal for an upcoming economic slowdown, cut their positions. December and the year 2005 ended in a sell-off which undid any gains acquired in the recent breakouts, a fitting conclusion for a year that saw the U.S. stock markets range bound and making even less headway than in 2004.

As the New Year got started, just as many investors took the absence of year-end rally and the fact that many indicators had breached their support levels as evidence of a market that is rolling over, many feared it might well repeat the severe 2005 January losses. Then, when least expected, the markets jolted everyone back to reality with a sharp advance which went much further than merely erasing last week's losses. The U.S. and the major world markets got a big boost when the Federal Reserve Board meeting summary seemed to indicate nearing the end of their rate hikes. Yet somehow, it seemed that there was much more to the bullish sentiment than interest rates. The advance carried through every single session, including Friday in the face of sharply higher oil prices, with multiple indices closing at levels not seen since May 2001. The rally saw broad industry participation but leadership came from the large cap technology companies in the Nasdaq 100 , another stark contrast with 2005. As expected, volume was much higher than the previous holiday week, and well above average.

For the week, the Nasdaq 100 vaulted 5.46%, followed by the Russell 200 and S&P 500 which posted very respectable gains of 3.89% and 2.98% respectively. A good start to 2006! The week's bullish action went to reinforce our Model's Buy state.

Back to the Top of the page


Trend Timing School
2005 year in review

For investors focusing primarily on the broad U.S. stock market, 2005 was a year to forget. The market stayed tightly range bound with little amplitude and little trading, which resulted in even lower performance than 2004. In contrast to the single digit gains in the U.S., almost all world markets advanced at a brisk pace delivering handsome rewards to diversified investors.

The 2005 at a glance table below clearly shows market rotation in progress with last years best strategy, Long Only, relegated to last and Long and Short with Margin regaining the top spot it frequently occupies. In the U.S., the Mid Cap S&P 400 was clearly the winner while many-times top dog Nasdaq 100 took the fall and ended up last. On the international front, Brazil took the honors while last year's winner, Hong Kong, trailed the field. On the U.S. sector front, the overall winner is the Energy , with a whopping 72.88% return with Long and Short (and 177.42% when adding margin!), and the losers were Healthcare and Real Estate.

2005 at a glance

Number of signals 
4
Best strategy 
Long & Short with Margin
Worst strategy 
Long Only
Best U.S. index 
Mid Cap S&P 400 (^MID)
Worst U.S. index 
Nasdaq 100 (^NDX)
Best international ETF 
Brazil (EWZ)
Worst international ETF 
Hong Kong (EWH)
Best Sector ETF 
Energy (XLE)
Worst Sector ETF 
Healthcare (IYH)

For the actual results we have grouped by type and ranked the results of the major ETFs we track in the table below. The first thing that jumps out at you is the amount of green, and the size of the World Markets gains. Brazil returned 66.07% with the Long and Short strategy (147.83% with Margin). Admittedly, showing the performance of all these ETFs across our four strategies is misleading because there is no practical way to short some of them. While most ETFs can in principle be shorted, because of low liquidity your broker is likely to have none to loan you, and not many are optionable. Yet, for the majority of funds, even the Long Only strategy improves returns substantially over simple buy and hold, demonstrating the high levels of correlation between our signals and world markets.

The sector funds generally do not correlate with the broad market or our signals. They are listed for comparison's sake only and are not intended to trade with the TimingCube signal.

2005 ETF Performance rankings

U.S. Markets
Ticker
Fund Type
Long Only
Long Only
with
Margin
Long & Short
Long & Short
with
Margin
Buy & Hold
MDY
Mid Cap S&P 400
14.84
30.36
17.40
36.14
12.28
IWM
Small Cap Russell 2000
7.55
14.38
10.28
20.05
4.67
VTI
Wilshire 5000
5.91
11.56
6.40
12.57
5.39
SPY
Large Cap S&P 500
5.16
10.06
5.52
10.79
4.78
DIA
Large Cap Dow Jones Industrials
3.20
6.23
4.82
9.48
1.47
QQQQ
Large Cap Nasdaq 100
0.60
-0.43
-0.27
-2.22
1.40

World Markets
Ticker
Fund Type
Long Only
Long Only
with
Margin
Long & Short
Long & Short
with
Margin
Buy & Hold
EWZ
Brazil
60.40
131.44
66.07
147.83
54.74
ILF
Latin America
57.01
123.56
57.48
124.55
56.31
EWW
Mexico
52.17
112.24
57.47
127.36
46.96
EWC
Canada
39.72
86.77
51.09
117.69
28.75
EEM
Emerging markets
41.87
90.87
48.22
108.09
35.63
EWJ
Japan
36.51
77.42
47.37
106.10
25.99
EWA
Australia
29.42
63.44
41.58
94.62
17.64
EFA
Europe, Australia, and Far East
24.00
50.54
32.88
72.46
15.39
EWQ
France
21.91
46.03
32.69
72.36
11.57
EPP
Pacific ex-Japan
23.48
49.85
32.46
72.00
14.80
IEV
Europe
20.19
42.24
29.10
63.68
11.57
EWG
Germany
18.98
38.61
28.42
60.98
9.84
FXI
China
20.81
43.18
26.87
57.64
14.86
EWU
UK
13.78
28.21
19.82
42.01
7.88
EWH
Hong Kong
5.45
10.53
3.27
5.88
7.56

Industry Sectors
Note that individual industry sectors are generally not well correlated with the broad market or the
TimingCube signal
Ticker
Fund Type
Long Only
Long Only
with
Margin
Long & Short
Long & Short
with
Margin
Buy & Hold
XLE
Energy
57.01
129.86
72.88
177.42
41.90
GLD
Gold
29.40
63.24
37.38
83.66
21.66
IYM
Basic Materials
13.66
26.87
22.71
47.10
4.61
IDU
Utilities
15.15
31.52
16.96
35.50
13.21
SMH
Semiconductor
10.69
20.70
10.59
20.41
10.70
IYJ
Industrial
6.29
12.42
8.18
16.31
4.31
IYC
Consumer Services
0.55
0.77
3.70
7.02
-2.68
IYF
Financial
4.18
7.31
2.67
4.17
5.65
IYW
Technology
1.96
2.10
1.65
1.36
2.17
IYK
Consumer Goods
0.66
1.21
0.24
0.35
1.06
IYZ
Telecommunications
-3.62
-7.73
-1.38
-3.42
-5.83
IYR
Real Estate
0.73
0.08
-6.10
-13.42
7.60
IYH
Healthcare
1.19
2.02
-6.29
-13.00
8.74

The primary lesson from 2005 (besides patience) is diversification which we promote every chance we get. The world is a big place and more often than not the U.S. stock market will trail those of other countries. Just as we always recommend a blend of U.S. indices, to protect against one going bad (e.g. the Nasdaq 100 in 2005), but building a small portfolio of international holdings such as the EEM emerging markets fund , the EFA Europe, Australia, and Far East , and EWJ Japan or FXI China, would be a wise move for any Trend Timer.

We look forward to a trending 2006 and thank you for your continued support.

Back to the Top of the page


FAQ of the Week
Question: What is your take on the inverted yield curve?

As we foretold in our December 16, 2005 Trend Timing School article, the yields have inverted, meaning that longer maturity bonds, say 10-year, are paying lower rates than shorter ones, like the 2-year issues for example. Many point to research showing that each of the last six recessions was preceded by an inversion of the yield curve, as evidence of impending doom. Others remind them of the time in 1992-1994 when yield curve inversions resulted in the biggest bull market in history, not recessions. Even without the occasional exception to the rule, yield inversions are a poor stock market predictor because of timing. The recession that follows the inversion can occur a few months or a couple of years away.

Regardless of what we believe the impact of inverted yield curves may be, they play no role in our Model which, instead of trying to predict what the market should do, strictly looks at what the market is actually doing to find the predominant trend.

Warm wishes and until next week.

The TimingCube Staff

Back to the Top of the page


Follow TimingCube » Follow TimingCube on Facebook Follow TimingCube on Twitter Follow TimingCube on LinkedIn

   Turbo Model
   Results
 
   Classic Model
  
   Site Map
   Glossary

TimingCube® is a registered trademark of Fraser Partners, LLC.
Disclaimer/Terms of Use    Privacy Policy
©2001- Fraser Partners, LLC
  All Rights Reserved.