|
| |
 |
|
Signal Update |
 |
Current
Signal Performance as of
Signal
Type |
Trade
Date |
Return
since issued |
|
|
|
World |
U.S. |
|
Nasdaq
100
(QQQQ)
|
Russell
2000
(IWM)
|
S&P
500
(SPY)
|
|

|
Market Update |
 |
Stocks lost ground on light trade during the last week of the year. With many investors remaining on the sidelines to enjoy the holiday season, it came at no surprise that trading activity remained subdued all week. The major averages hardly budged at all during the week's first three sessions, despite positive news showing that the economy is getting stronger: consumer confidence is improving, home prices are stabilizing, retail sales ahead of Christmas rose vs last year's numbers and the Chicago Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) for December came in better than expected. Stocks looked ready for a repeat Thursday ahead of the New Year holiday as they remained little changed for most of the session, but sellers stepped in during the last half-hour to yield the S&P 500 a 1% daily loss as some investors apparently decided to lock in 2009 profits.
The Nasdaq 100 (QQQQ), S&P 500 (SPY) and Russell 2000 (IWM) respectively lost 0.50%, 0.92% and 1.45% over the four-day span. All three ETFs remain located above both their 50-day and 200-day exponential moving averages (EMAs).
For its part, our World portfolio again outperformed
its U.S. counterparts this week with a 0.51%
gain. The portfolio consists of the 5 top-ranked world ETFs
as of December 4, which marked the beginning of the current
4-week holding period. Please note that the World
portfolio is being rebalanced today, as the current 4-week holding
period is now over.
Our current Buy
signal remains in effect.

|
Trend Timing School |
 |
A
"lost" decade in stocks?
Many market commentators are talking about the "lost decade"
in stocks. The S&P 500
looks to end the year 20-25% below its starting value of ten
years ago. Factoring in dividends received helps a little, but
only a little in this era of stock buybacks rather than higher
dividend payments. The Nasdaq Composite index, which entered this decade at a moonshot trajectory, will likely
end up having lost a bit less than half its value - back about
where it began 1999 and before the true moonshot that kicked
off later that year.
Looking back we know all too well the excesses that led to this
"lost" decade in stocks. There was the dot-com bubble,
which rolled into a real estate bubble, with perhaps a mini-bubble
in oil prices thrown in for good measure. All those bubbles
have been popped with perhaps others being formed as we speak.
But to look at the decade in stocks as having been a bust is
to grossly miss the opportunities and tremendous gains that
have been available to investors. The bust was really contained
to large-cap stocks and financials. For example, Intel and Microsoft
are down 35-40% for the decade. Pfizer lost almost 30%. Walmart
dropped 15%. The financial ETF (XLF) is down 30% for the ten
years. But small cap stocks were fantastic - no "lost"
decade there!
Chart 1 below shows the performance of the
100 largest S&P stocks compared to equally weighted versions
of some of the weakest sectors of the decade - tech, financials,
and healthcare. The small cap stocks within even these laggard
sectors performed quite well lifting the equal weight version
to solid returns.
Chart 1: 100 largest S&P stocks versus weakest sectors

Chart 2 expands on this theme by comparing a stronger sector
- energy. With oil prices soaring in early 2008 energy stocks
of all stripes took flight. However, once again, the performance
of the small caps dwarfed that of the giants of the industry.
And despite the absolute crash in real estate, stocks of real
estate investment trusts - those owners of now-empty strip shopping
centers, but also of office buildings, hospitals, etc - have
had a reasonable decade.
Chart 2: S&P 500 versus sectors

The real story of the decade has, of course, been the emergence
of China and its BRIC cohort as a powerful economic force. Fueled
in part by China's building boom in preparation to host the
Olympic games, natural resources soared throughout much of the
decade delivering massive gains to investors in China and other
emerging markets. The explosive growth in exchange-traded funds
(ETFs) allowed investors easy access to this enormous opportunity.
Our World ETF Ranking approach took advantage
of this trend and helped guide you to the best opportunities.
The results of that guidance, and our other model returns, are
as follows:
Chart 3: World ETF Ranking as of 12/31/2009

You know well our belief that buy and hold can be substantially
improved upon, especially in secular bear markets such as this
decade has delivered. While many investors have spent the past
ten years struggling to find, and hold onto, market gains, we
hope we have helped make that goal a much greater reality. We
never know what turns the market brings next. But we remain
adamently committed to following our Models to the types of
gains shown above. We look forward to continuing to have you
along for the ride in the next decade.

|
FAQ of the Week |
 |
Question:
What is this 2010 Roth IRA conversion all about?
Traditional IRA accounts receive a tax deduction when the
money is put into the account. When the money is withdrawn,
the owner of the account pays taxes usually at their ordinary
income tax rate. Roth IRA accounts do not receive the upfront
tax deduction but instead get favorable tax treatment on the
distributions from the account - no taxes on most distributions.
In short, traditional IRAs are taxed on the way out, Roth
IRAs are taxed on the way in. The benefit of the Roth IRA,
then, is that all the gains that build up in the account are
tax free, which is a huge benefit over decades of returns.
Investors can generally convert from one type of IRA to the
other. But doing so carries tax implications. For example,
converting from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA causes you
to pay taxes on those "distributions" from the account,
and pay them at an ordinary income tax rate. Conversions might
also be restricted based on income and other factors. Beginning
in 2010, Roth IRAs will waive the income restrictions, meaning
that higher income account owners can now convert their accounts
to Roth IRAs. To make the conversion more enticing, the federal
government is allowing account owners who convert to spread
their tax burden over a two year period.
We are certainly not tax or investment advisors nor financial
planners. If you are interested in converting to a Roth IRA
and taking advantage of this unique opportunity, we would
recommend you consult with your tax and/or financial professional.
Warm wishes and until next week.
The TimingCube
Staff
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|