
|
 |
|
Signal Update |
 |
Current
Signal Performance as of
Signal
Type |
Trade
Date |
Index |
Return
since issued |
|
|
|
Nasdaq 100 |
|
Russell 2000 |
|
S&P 500 |
|

|
Market Update |
 |
The major
averages moved modestly higher in what has been a see-saw week.
Stocks did not move much the first 2 days of the week, before
retreating Wednesday on heavier trade after the release of the
last Fed meeting's minutes showed that officials remain preoccupied
with inflation pressures. Higher oil prices also did not help.
Stocks were able to bounce back and recoup their losses Thursday,
albeit on lower volume. The PPI (Producer Price Index) for March
was released Friday and came in at 1%. The number seems high,
but the Core PPI, which excludes food and energy prices was
flat in March, therefore alleviating some of the inflation concerns
that had built up following the release of the Fed minutes.
The news helped stocks post moderate gains on light volume Friday.
The Nasdaq 100, S&P 500 and Russell 2000 respectively gained
0.22%, 0.74% and 0.63% on the week. All 3 indexes rest above
both their 50-day exponential moving average (EMA) and 200-day
EMA.
For its part, our World Index Ranking portfolio
again outperformed the US averages as it posted a 1.59%
gain this week. The portfolio consists of the 5 top-ranked world
indexes as of March 30, which marked the beginning of the current
4-week holding period. Please note that since we now have an
active Cash signal,
the World Index Ranking approach calls for
selling your holdings if you follow the "Long Only"
or "Long and Short" strategy. You should remain
invested in the top 5 indexes only if you follow the "Buy
and Rebalance" strategy, which remains invested at
all times. Please go to our "Strategies"
page for all the details.
Our Cash signal remains
in effect.
|
Trend Timing School |
 |
China:
opportunity or threat?
That's the trillion dollar question. And the short answer is
both. The Chinese economy has been growing by leaps and bounds
for years and is unlikely to slow down anytime soon. As millions
of Chinese move into middle-class, their new found prosperity
represents huge demand U.S. companies and others are falling
over each other to serve. The Chinese companies which are fueling
the economy through manufactured goods exports appear to be
just the thing for investors trying to revitalize and rejuvenate
their sagging investment portfolios. On the other hand, as the
giant awakens it causes massive imbalances which have the potential
to directly threaten the U.S. economically and geopolitically.
Economists looking for the root causes for the incredible Chinese
expansion are generally pointing at two likely explanations:
- Their
government, while maintaining strong control, has aggressively
instituted and promoted pro-business policies and simultaneously
practiced targeted intervention involving subsidizing selected
sectors, protectionism and currency manipulation
- Their
high savings and investment rates
2006
marked the fifth consecutive year the U.S. trade deficit set
a new record, reaching a staggering $765 billion, of which
$233 billion was with China, more than any other country.
The bottom line is that the U.S. is now a developed and mature
economy with an expected growth rate of 2-3% over the next
five years, while China is in full development phase with
economic growth projected at 7 to 8% over the same period.
While China's economic growth is bound to run into problems
along the way and experience temporary slowdowns, the general
consensus is that it is most likely to continue for decades
to come. Incredible as it seems, the rise of China as an economic
powerhouse has largely gone ignored by the West. China is
sneaking up. In his book "Three Billion New Capitalists: The Great Shift of Wealth and Power to the East ", Clyde Prestowitz voices
what more and more pundits are predicting: that powerful converging
trends are shifting wealth and power to Asia. He warns of
America's increasingly unsustainable trade deficits and the
equally unsustainable buildup of massive dollar reserves in
places like Japan and China.
The reason this is such a big deal is that the Chinese central
bank is actually financing the massive U.S. trade deficit
to the tune of about $1 billion a day. Without those loans,
U.S. interest rates would spike upward, the dollar would plummet
and the economy would go into a recession. And you know what
that means for the stock market. Some go as far as characterizing
the relationship as life support. If China does not finance
our daily deficit, the patient dies. As a result, China is
now the second largest owner of U.S. Treasuries. Japan tops
the list (with $644 billion), followed by China ($350 billion),
United Kingdom ($239 billion) and oil exporting countries
($100 billion).
The sadistic twist is that with close to a trillion in dollar
denominated assets China is not anxious to undermine its value.
China cannot stop buying its daily load of U.S. treasuries
from the proceeds of the trade imbalance, and they cannot
afford to dump billions of dollars on the open market for
fear of providing the dollar death knell.
Still, for a very secretive country like China, there has
been a lot of news coverage about their publicly stated intent
to diversify its rapidly growing foreign exchange reserves.
A number of Chinese officials have made speeches recently
about creating a new agency to invest in non-dollar foreign
currencies, as well natural resources such as gold and oil.
In addition to existing currency reserves diversification,
officials in Beijing have also been hinting that China will
gradually decrease its purchases of dollar denominated assets.
China is facing the very real danger of inflaming protectionist
sentiment and measures from its trading partners. In fact,
political pressure on the Bush administration to do something
about the soaring trade deficit with China is beginning to
cause a sea change in U.S. trade policy. Just this week the
Bush administration announced it is filing more trade cases
against China with the World Trade Organization. The disputes
range from lax enforcement of violations of copyrights and
trademarks, to China's barriers to the sale of certain U.S.
products. This follows a decision last month to impose penalty
tariffs on certain Chinese paper imports, a decision which
reversed a U.S. free trade policy which lasted for 23 years.
In addition to the recent tariffs and other measures the U.S.
government has an open campaign to pressure China to revalue
its currency (to make its exports more expensive to U.S. customers)
and to clean up "unfair" trade practices. Congress, where
Senators voted last month to call for a 27.5 percent tariff
on all imports from China if it failed to alter its exchange
rate substantially, is joining the fray. This is serious stuff.
Some call it war. Be careful what you wish for. The China
versus U.S. trade deficit debate is unlikely to be won by
bullying tactics yet it looks exactly like the path we have
embarked on.
China is clearly developing into a formidable global competitor
for the U.S., and while the trade imbalance has been the obvious
rub, there is a much broader conflict brewing for world dominance.
As China strives to keep its economic engine growing it constantly
needs to expand its supplies of raw materials, energy, as
well as finding new markets for its exports. In doing so it
inevitably runs into the U.S. and its global interests. As
the war of words and trade barriers escalates, and the U.S.
increasingly flaunting its military power in the Taiwan Strait
and other disputed areas such as the Spratly Islands in the
South China Sea (due to large gas and oil deposits), the two
parties would be well served to open direct communication
channels to insure their competitive gamesmanship does not
deteriorate into an all out trade war.
In the mean time many still view China as a huge investment
opportunity and we plan to expand on the topic of investing
in China next week.

|
FAQ of the Week |
 |
Question:
What is the best place for my cash?
The goal of Trend Timing is clearly to be invested in the stock
market most of the time but, when we are not, we might as well
seek cash equivalent investments that do better than strictly
cash. This question comes up not only during Cash
signals but also during Sell
signals for investors implementing Long Only
strategies.
By default most brokers will have you set-up with a "cash reserves"
or "sweep account" which pays little or no interest and typically
has expenses in the 0.5% to 0.75% range. Some rare brokers offer
"sweep money market funds" as a cash reserves alternative to
their clients, or to their largest clients. If you have access
to such an account, take it, it is probably your best choice.
Most money market funds currently yield in the 4.5% to 5% range
but are position traded, meaning that you have to buy them like
any other fund and pay a commission for the transaction.
Beyond money market funds which keep your capital safe, you
can find a wide range of bond and other so-called high-yield
funds which can deliver substantially higher rates. While some
of these can deliver annual return rates of 15% or more, in
doing so they take higher risks and your base capital can fluctuate
in value.
For the comparatively short periods of time we are positioned
in cash, liquidity is our prime objective and we prefer the
safety and expediency of money market funds.
Warm
wishes and until next week.
The TimingCube
Staff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |

Learn how to WIN BIG with
Exchange Traded Funds
Get the definitive ETF Investing Report
Request your FREE REPORT Now!
|
|
|
|
|