
|
 |
|
Signal Update |
 |
Current
Signal Performance as of
Signal
Type |
Trade
Date |
Index |
Return
since issued |
|
|
|
Nasdaq 100 |
|
Russell 2000 |
|
S&P 500 |
|

|
Market Update |
 |
It has been
a very positive week for stocks, with both the Dow Jones Industrial
Average
and the Russell 2000
hitting new all-time highs. The Federal Reserve announced Wednesday
that it was leaving interest rates unchanged at 5.25% for the
fifth straight time. The Fed pointed to a strengthening economy.
It also noted that core pricing pressures have eased but that
wage inflation is continuing. Even though the statement clearly
implied that the Fed will not cut interest rates anytime soon,
investors obviously liked what they heard as the major averages
rallied after the announcement. The Labor Department said Friday
that the economy created 111,000 nonfarm payrolls in January,
less than the 150,000 that had been anticipated. While disappointing
at first, it should be noted that the number is likely to be
revised higher as the December figure was, with an additional
39,000 jobs. Oil prices continued to rebound, closing the week
at their highest level of the year ($59 a barrel).
For the week, the Nasdaq 100
and S&P 500
respectively gained 1.42% and 1.84%. Small stocks did even better,
as the Russell 2000 posted a gain of 2.70%. All three indexes
are back above both their respective 50-day and 200-day exponential
moving averages (EMAs).
For its part, our World Index Ranking portfolio
posted a 2.25% gain
this week. The portfolio consists of the 5 top-ranked world
indexes as of January 5, which marked the beginning of the current
4-week holding period. The World Index Ranking
portfolio is being rebalanced today, as the current 4-week holding
period is now over. Please note that since we now have an active
Sell signal, the World
Index Ranking approach calls for selling your holdings
if you follow the "Long Only" or "Long
and Short" strategy. You should remain invested in
the top 5 indexes only if you follow the "Buy and Rebalance"
strategy, which remains invested at all times. Please go to
our "Strategies"
page for all the details.
Our active Sell signal
remains in effect.
|
Trend Timing School |
 |
The
strategies
As promised in the January 12, 2007 update, after having reviewed
the basics of Trend Timing and the Model that drives our signals,
we continue our series of introductory editorials with a look
at the TimingCube
strategies. Strategies are important. The strategy or strategies
we choose are the plan of action intended to accomplish our
specific investment goal, in accordance with our personal risk
tolerance. We all have to select our strategies when we begin,
but it is beneficial from time to time to review where we stand
in the face of a changing environment. For example, the advent
of new investment vehicles such as the inverse and leveraged
ETFs is making some strategies possible which were impractical
only a few months ago. The introduction of the World
Index Ranking service has also added a new dimension
to our strategy choices.
Ideally, even Trend Timers would like to be invested for the
long term and be able to just forget about their investments.
We are really like buy and hold investors at heart, almost.
Like them we seek to participate in all meaningful market advances,
but in stark contrast with them we also want to avoid all significant
declines. Yes we know that the stock market goes up more often
than it goes down, and that over time markets always go up.
We also know that every once in a while a severe bear market
occurs which can wipe out a generation of investors and require
many years to recover from. Whether we are in our forties or
already retired, our investment years are extremely precious
and we believe they should be spent building wealth, not recouping
losses. To side-step significant declines Trend Timing defines
four distinct investment strategies presenting the investor
with diverse risk/reward choices. They consist of two basic
strategies, each with a leverage option:
Long
Only
This
is the most conservative investment strategy we follow.
Conservative yes, but it beats buy and hold consistently.
It keeps us invested during Buy
signals, and puts us safely in cash or money market funds
during Sell signals.
Long Only with Margin*
Same as Long Only, with leverage applied.
For example, with full margin, when the reference index
goes up 1% your investment gains 2%. The same goes for losses.
Long and Short
This is our bread and butter strategy which we
view as the optimal risk/reward tradeoff. Like Long
Only it keeps us invested during Buy
signals but during Sell
signals we short the market in an attempt to benefit from
the potential decline.
Long and Short with Margin*
Same as Long and Short, with leverage applied
* Note
that while we list the "with Margin" strategies as full fledged
strategies we do not recommend that the average investor uses
more than 20%. Very few of us have the stomach for the wild
ride a fully margined portfolio is sure to deliver.
When selecting a strategy it is important to remember that
Trend Timing is fundamentally an insurance policy. No investment
system is perfect and not all Sell
signals our Model triggers are the beginning of a severe decline.
Sell signals can
end-up being false alerts, small pull-backs or corrections
delivering small gains or losses. This is the price we pay,
the insurance premium so to speak, for protection against
the significant bear market losses. We will make most of our
money during Buy
signals. The Long and Short strategies will
frequently trail the Long Only and even the
buy and hold strategies during long ascending market phases.
On occasion when the bear market hits, the Sell
signals can provide Long and Short investors
some handsome rewards for their patience to put them ahead
of the pack when it comes to long term returns.
For many, at least some of the strategy decisions are dictated
by what is allowable by the broker in the type of account
we have or by what investment vehicles are available. At the
most limiting extreme of the scale are retirement accounts
such as 401(k) which typically offer a small set of investment
options which most likely excludes any shorting or leverage
choices, leaving us with the Long Only strategy.
IRAs used to have the same limitations but the advent of bull/bear
mutual fund families (Direxion, ProFunds, and Rydex) and more
recently of short and leveraged ETF offerings (ProShares)
has removed much of these constraints.
In additon to choosing a strategy we also have to decide where
we want to invest. Traditionally, our U.S.-based subscribers
have selected two or three U.S. market indexes to follow (e.g.
Nasdaq 100, Russell 2000, and S&P 500) and allocated their funds among them for diversification.
Since the introduction of the World Index Ranking
service we now have the option of targeting the strongest
markets. Even for investors who feel more comfortable with
U.S. markets, the rankings let you target the strongest of
the 7 U.S. indexes included in the list.
To the fundamental Trend Timing principle of "participating
in all meaningful advances and avoiding significant declines"
the World Index Ranking service adds the
notion of participating in the world's strongest markets.
The addition of the momentum-based targeting of the World
Index Ranking and its combination with the basic
directional TimingCube
Buy/Sell
signals instigates three new distinct strategies:
Long
Only
This strategy invests in the top 5 indexes and rebalances
every 4 weeks during Buy
signals, and goes to cash during Sell
signals
Long and Short
This is the main stream strategy which invests in the top
5 indexes and rebalances every 4 weeks during Buy
signals, and goes short QQQQ
shares during Sell
signals. An alternative to shorting QQQQ is to simply buy
the inverse ETF ticker symbol PSQ
Buy and Rebalance
This strategy ignores the Buy/Sell
signals altogether and stays fully invested in the top 5
indexes at all times, and rebalances every 4 weeks. We do
not particularly advocate this strategy but include it as
reference (a reference which also happens to beat buy and
holding the U.S. markets)
Note
that for the World Index Ranking strategies
we intentionally omit the "with Margin" strategies because
we feel that the higher volatility and risk inherent in the
top ranked world markets represents sufficient leverage for
most of us.
Most investors have different types of accounts and will adopt
a blend of strategies to accomplish their varied objectives.
The important things to remember when selecting a strategy
are to keep it simple and manageable, and to only take on
as much risk as we are willing to live with.

|
FAQ of the Week |
 |
Question:
Why is the TimingCube
service index-based?
It was always our intent to focus on the broad stock market
trend and not that of individual investments. Basing our Model
on widely accessible and respected stock market indexes was
the obvious choice then as it is now. In addition to driving
our Model with the Nasdaq Composite
index
our service tracks and reports performance for selected benchmark
indexes. In turn our subscribers are free to implement the strategies
with whatever investment vehicle they desire: ETFs, mutual funds,
options or futures.
This question has come up more frequently since we introduced
the World Index Ranking service. ETFs following
U.S. indexes have tracked well but the same cannot always be
said for ETFs following foreign indexes. Read the FAQ of the
weekly update we sent on January 12, 2007: "Why do index
ETFs not always perform as the indexes they track?"
for details. Because of performance differences which occur
from time to time between some ETFs and their indexes, some
have come to wonder why we do not simply rank the ETFs instead
of the indexes. Our motivation for sticking with the indexes
goes beyond preserving the freedom to choose your investment
vehicle. The World Index Ranking is designed
to identify the strongest world stock markets, independent of
other parameters such as fluctuations in exchange rates. Not
only is our index-based ranking currency agnostic but it can
also be used by our International subscribers, neither of which
could be said with an ETF-based ranking system.
Warm
wishes and until next week.
The TimingCube
Staff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |

Learn how to WIN BIG with
Exchange Traded Funds
Get the definitive ETF Investing Report
Request your FREE REPORT Now!
|
|
|
|
|