
|
 |
|
Signal Update |
 |
Current
Signal Performance as of
Signal
Type |
Trade
Date |
Index |
Return
since issued |
|
|
|
Nasdaq 100 |
|
Russell 2000 |
|
S&P 500 |
|

|
Market Update |
 |
After a
brief pause, markets returned to their winning ways this week.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at a new all-time high
while the Nasdaq Composite finished above the 2,500 mark for
the first time since February 2001.
Apple introduced its long-awaited
iPhone on Tuesday. The well-received announcement boosted the
tech sector and helped the Nasdaq 100 close higher each day
of the week. Stocks were also supported by lower energy costs,
as crude oil prices hit fresh 18-month lows. Friday brought
more evidence that the economy remains healthy: retail sales
increased by 0.9% in December, the largest monthly rise since
July. Investors cheered the news as it countered the perception
that consumers might reduce their spending due to the slowdown
in the housing sector. Please note that US markets will be closed
on Monday, January 15 in observance of Martin Luther King Jr.
Day.
The Nasdaq 100, Russell 2000 and S&P 500 respectively gained
3.33%, 2.37% and 1.49% on the week. All three indexes are back
above both their respective 50-day and 200-day exponential moving
averages (EMAs).
For its part, our World Index Ranking portfolio
underperformed the US averages as it posted a modest 0.21%
loss this week. The portfolio consists of the 5 top-ranked world
indexes as of January 5, which marked the beginning of the current
4-week holding period.
Our current Buy
signal remains in effect. 
|
Trend Timing School |
 |
Trend
Timing revisited
TimingCube
being the home of Trend Timing you would expect that much of
what we write about is at least somewhat related to that general
topic, especially in the appropriately labeled "Trend Timing
School" column. With this in mind it came as a surprise to realize
how long it has been since we provided a solid definition for
the Trend Timing investment approach. We realize that most of
our subscribers have not been around since the early days when
the Trend Timing School articles established the foundations
of our investment system and philosophy (and most have better
things to do with their lives than to read hundreds of past
articles.) With this in mind we decided to start the New Year
with a series of articles which should help everyone come up
to speed on Trend Timing, the Model that drives our signals
and our strategies.
The first place to start is with our own Glossary
which defines Trend Timing as: "A unique form of market timing
consisting of following the broad market trend to profit in
both rising and falling markets. An alternative to buy and hold
investing. TimingCube
are the inventors of the Trend Timing investment philosophy."
Where buy and hold investors stay invested all the time on the
basis that over the long haul stock markets always go up, Trend
Timers on the other hand realize markets will continue to be
a succession of up and down trends and that it is counterproductive
to spend much of the uptrends recouping the losses experienced
during the previous downtrend. Since we are investors, not traders,
we are not trying to exploit short term blips, imbalances or
swings. Instead we want to participate in all meaningful advances
and to do that we need to be fully invested most of the time,
even through market pullbacks and some corrections. We will
however step aside during major downtrends in order to keep
our powder dry for the next uptrend, or better yet, profit from
the downtrend as well as by shorting the market.
When it comes to market timing there are many approaches with
a mixed track record. Surprisingly, many timing schemes are
based on outright predictions. This is not only true for tea
leaves readers and other astrologers, but for many seemingly
scientific methods such as market cycle theories and seasonality
investing. We never predict what the market should do next.
Instead, we let the market tell us what it is doing. We are
trend followers and we do not predict the direction of the trend,
how long a trend will last or how strong it will be. No one
can. Trend following is a style of stock market investing which
uses observation of the broad market trend, and the detection
of trend changes, to derive the timing of Buy
and Sell signals.
Even within the ranks of trend followers there are many varieties
of approaches. Everything has trends, and they can range from
mega trends to micro trends. We are after the broad stock market
trend, not individual stocks industry groups or indexes, on
the age old principle that a rising tide lifts all boats. The
timing horizon or duration of the trend is another key distinction.
As long-term investors, the trend we are interested in is where
the market is likely headed in the next 3 to 6 months, which
correlates with our average of about 3 trades per year and average
signal duration of about 4 months. The broad market approach
and the mid-term trend orientation not only shields us from
much of the market noise but it also yields the unique characteristic
of having a single trend indicator for not only a particular
U.S. market segment but for all the major world markets.
The predominant stock market trend is either up or down. Even
during periods when the market seems trendless, the underlying
trend remains until the Model detects a change and a signal
is issued. The beauty of Trend Timing is that we always know
exactly where we stand. Although the signals are sometimes perceived
as an event or a finite point in time because we issue an e-mail
on the day a trend change is detected, as long as the trend
is up we have a Buy
signal, and as long as the trend is down we have a Sell
signal. The Buy
and Sell conditions
remain in effect until the next trend change.
Next week we plan to review the Model which drives the signals.

|
FAQ of the Week |
 |
Question:
Why do index ETFs not always perform as the indexes they track?
By and large, index ETFs actually do a very good job at achieving
their daily performance goal of matching the index they track.
Daily tracking is generally not the issue. Over time however,
there are differences that creep in which, in certain cases,
can be significant. These discrepancies can be in your favor
or not. Depending on the type of fund, there can be three separate
causes for ETF-Index divergence. Note that so-called closed-end
ETFs are not index ETFs and cannot be expected to track an index.
- ETFs
are required by the SEC to distribute substantially all
dividends and capital gains they receive from the companies
they hold. The index on the other hand does not hold stock
and does not pay distributions. In some instances index
performance will also be reported as "dividend adjusted
returns", but it is fairly rare. Because of the distributions,
an ETF will generally outperform the index it tracks, unless
distributions are negated by one of the other culprits below.
For more details read December 12th, 2006 Weekly Update: "ETF
dividends and distributions"
- International
ETFs have one major source of divergence that their domestic
siblings do not: currency fluctuations. An index is an artificial
construct which is calculated by combining the prices of
the stocks it is composed of in the currency of the home
country where the stocks are traded. It is not directly
affected by that country's currency valuation. International
ETFs in contrast are instruments traded in U.S. dollars
on American stock exchanges and they will benefit from any
gains the foreign currency makes against the dollar, or
be hurt if the dollar strengthens. The effects of currency
movements are further detailed in "Are
international ETFs affected by currency movements?"
- For
the new breed of leveraged ETFs such as the ProShares funds
there is yet a third possible source of divergence between
ETF and index: negative compounding. For mathematical reasons
similar to why it takes a 100% gain to recover from a 50%
loss, negative compounding will adversely impact a leveraged
ETF during trendless market phases. When markets strongly
trend this turns into a benefit for the ETF performance.
For detailed mechanics of the negative compounding effect
please read "Do leveraged
ETFs suffer from negative compounding?"
Warm
wishes and until next week.
The TimingCube
Staff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |

Learn how to WIN BIG with
Exchange Traded Funds
Get the definitive ETF Investing Report
Request your FREE REPORT Now!
|
|
|
|
|